Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

A comparative study of Ag and Cu adhesion on an MgO(001) surface

  • Yuri F. Zhukovskii*
  • , Eugene A. Kotomin
  • , David Fuks
  • , Simon Dorfman
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Latvia
  • Ben-Gurion University of the Negev
  • Technion-Israel Institute of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

15 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Ab initio calculations were performed on 2D slab models of copper and silver adhesion on a perfect MgO(001) surface using density functional theory (DFT) combined with the localized atomic wave functions, as implemented in both CRYSTAL-98 and CRYSTAL-03 computer codes. To clarify the nature of the interfacial bonding, we consider slab models of the Ag/MgO(001) and Cu/MgO(001) interfaces with six different substrate coverages, varied from 1/4 monolayer (ML) up to 2 ML. The dependence of several key interface properties on the substrate coverage is analyzed. For all coverages, the most favorable sites for the adsorption of metal atoms are found to be above the surface O2- ions, whereas Cu atoms are found to be more strongly bonded on a magnesia substrate, with shorter bond lengths zCu-O2- . Our calculations indicate that a weak atomic polarization induces the interaction between the metal atoms and the defect-free MgO substrate and gives the dominant contribution to the bonding on the regular interfaces. Growth of metal coverage simultaneously reduces the binding energy with substrate per adatom and enhances the interatomic interaction inside the metal adlayer.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)63-72
Number of pages10
JournalSuperlattices and Microstructures
Volume36
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2004
EventEuropean Materials Research Society 2004 - Strasbourg, France
Duration: 24 May 200428 May 2004

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A comparative study of Ag and Cu adhesion on an MgO(001) surface'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this