Abstract
The Human Condition is neither a well-defined nor well-described concept—nevertheless, it is generally agreed that human sexuality is a fundamental and constituent part of it. For most able-bodied persons, accessing and expressing one's sexuality is a (relatively) trouble-free process. However, many disabled persons experience difficulty in accessing their sexuality, while others experience such significant barriers that they are often precluded from sexual citizenship altogether. Recognising the barriers to the sexual citizenship of disabled persons, the concept of a Welfare-Funded Sex Doula Program has been advanced — a program specifically aimed at meeting the various (and often complex) sexual needs of disabled people. Below we show how that program can be justified within at least two different moral frameworks, the capabilities approach and liberal utilitarianism, and consider and repudiate arguments against it.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 125-140 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Apr 2023 |
OECD Field of Science
- 3. Medical and Health Sciences
Keywords
- Capabilities approach
- Disability
- Healthcare rights
- Liberal utilitarianism
- Sex doula
- Sexual citizenship
- Sexual rights of disabled
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Anent the theoretical justification of a sex doula program'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver