TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessment of genetically modified maize NK603 × T25 × DAS-40278-9 and subcombinations, for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-164)
AU - EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO)
AU - Mullins, Ewen
AU - Bresson, Jean Louis
AU - Dalmay, Tamas
AU - Dewhurst, Ian Crawford
AU - Epstein, Michelle M.
AU - Firbank, Leslie George
AU - Guerche, Philippe
AU - Hejatko, Jan
AU - Naegeli, Hanspeter
AU - Moreno, Francisco Javier
AU - Nogué, Fabien
AU - Rostoks, Nils
AU - Sánchez Serrano, Jose Juan
AU - Savoini, Giovanni
AU - Veromann, Eve
AU - Veronesi, Fabio
AU - Ardizzone, Michele
AU - De Sanctis, Giacomo
AU - Fernandez Dumont, Antonio
AU - Federici, Silvia
AU - Gennaro, Andrea
AU - Gomez Ruiz, Jose Angel
AU - Kagkli, Dafni Maria
AU - Lanzoni, Anna
AU - Neri, Franco Maria
AU - Papadopoulou, Nikoletta
AU - Paraskevopoulos, Konstantinos
AU - Raffaello, Tommaso
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 European Food Safety Authority. EFSA Journal published by John Wiley and Sons Ltd on behalf of European Food Safety Authority.
PY - 2021/12
Y1 - 2021/12
N2 - Maize NK603 × T25 × DAS-40278-9 (three-event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: NK603, T25 and DAS-40278-9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single maize events and two of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the two subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three-event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three-event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the non-GM comparator and the selected non-GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the three-event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in one of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the three-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three-event stack maize. Post-market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three-event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as the non-GM comparator and the selected non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
AB - Maize NK603 × T25 × DAS-40278-9 (three-event stack maize) was produced by conventional crossing to combine three single events: NK603, T25 and DAS-40278-9. The GMO Panel previously assessed the three single maize events and two of the subcombinations and did not identify safety concerns. No new data on the single maize events or the two subcombinations were identified that could lead to modification of the original conclusions on their safety. The molecular characterisation, comparative analysis (agronomic, phenotypic and compositional characteristics) and the outcome of the toxicological, allergenicity and nutritional assessment indicate that the combination of the single maize events and of the newly expressed proteins in the three-event stack maize does not give rise to food and feed safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel concludes that the three-event stack maize, as described in this application, is as safe as the non-GM comparator and the selected non-GM reference varieties. In the case of accidental release of viable grains of the three-event stack maize into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The GMO Panel assessed the likelihood of interactions among the single events in one of the maize subcombinations not previously assessed and concludes that these are expected to be as safe as the single events, the previously assessed subcombinations and the three-event stack maize. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of the three-event stack maize. Post-market monitoring of food/feed is not considered necessary. The GMO Panel concludes that the three-event stack maize and its subcombinations are as safe as the non-GM comparator and the selected non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85122138164
U2 - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6942
DO - 10.2903/j.efsa.2021.6942
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85122138164
SN - 1831-4732
VL - 19
JO - EFSA Journal
JF - EFSA Journal
IS - 12
M1 - e06942
ER -