Abstract
The authors regret, that when analyzing the primary spectra of the mass spectrometer, namely the dependences of the change in pressure of gases with mass number M4, a significant inaccuracy was made - the different probability of ionization of helium and the HT molecule was not taken into account, which led to an incorrect assessment of the equilibrium release of tritium from the ceramics. To maintain the exact meaning, it was necessary to make a change to the article of the following nature: the graphs in Fig. 10 (which shows the results of simulation tritium release at the initial stage of the experiments) were renormalized in accordance with the updated data on tritium release (the shape of the graphs did not change, but the range of fluxes tritium release is now indicated correctly). Corrected Fig. 10 is shown below. Also, in the “Acknowledgments” section the program number should be read as No. BR21881930. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | 101747 |
| Journal | Nuclear Materials and Energy |
| Volume | 41 |
| DOIs |
|
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrigendum to “Comparative analysis of gas release from biphasic lithium ceramics pebble beds of various pebbles sizes and content under neutron irradiation conditions” [Nucl. Mater. Energy 38 (2024) 101583] (Nuclear Materials and Energy (2024) 38, (S235217912400005X), (10.1016/j.nme.2024.101583))'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver