Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Darolutamide and health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An analysis of the phase III ARAMIS trial

  • Smith Matthew R.
  • , Egils Vjaters
  • , Matthew R Smith 1
  • , Māris Ramba
  • , Tammela Teuvo L.
  • , Neal Shore
  • , Andrey Polyakov
  • , Teuvo L Tammela 3
  • , Ilona Sondore
  • , Albertas Ulys
  • , Sandis Karelis
  • , Egils Vjaters
  • , Sergey Polyakov 6
  • , Gunārs Kavals
  • , Mindaugas Jievaltas
  • , Mindaugas Jievaltas 7
  • , Murilo Luz 8
  • , Māris Dancis
  • , Boris Alekseev 9
  • , Ildze Straume
  • Iris Kuss 10, Armands Lazdiņš, Marie-Aude Le Berre 11, Ateesha F Mohamed 12, Dawn Odom 13, Jennifer Bartsch 13, Amir Snapir 14, Toni Sarapohja 14, Karim Fizazi 15
    • Ne LU

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    40 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Background: In the ARAMIS trial, darolutamide plus androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus placebo plus ADT significantly improved metastasis-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS) and time to pain progression in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC). Herein, we present analyses of patient-reported health-related quality of life (HRQoL) outcomes. Patients and methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase III trial randomised patients with nmCRPC and prostate-specific antigen doubling time ≤10 months to darolutamide 600 mg (n = 955) twice daily or matched placebo (n = 554) while continuing ADT. The primary end-point was MFS; the secondary end-points included OS and time to pain progression. In this analysis, HRQoL was assessed by the time to deterioration using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Prostate (FACT-P) prostate cancer subscale (PCS) and the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Prostate Cancer Module (EORTC QLQ-PR25) subscales. Results: Darolutamide significantly prolonged time to deterioration of FACT-P PCS versus placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.70–0.91; P = 0.0005) at the primary analysis (cut-off date: 3rd September 2018). Time to deterioration of EORTC QLQ-PR25 outcomes showed statistically significant delays with darolutamide versus placebo for urinary (HR 0.64, 95% CI 0.54–0.76; P < 0.0001) and bowel (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.66–0.92; P = 0.0027) symptoms. Time to worsening of hormonal treatment–related symptoms was similar between the two groups. Conclusion: In patients with nmCRPC who are generally asymptomatic, darolutamide maintained HRQoL by significantly delaying time to deterioration of prostate cancer–specific quality of life and disease-related symptoms versus placebo.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)138-146
    JournalEuropean Journal of Cancer
    Volume154
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
      SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

    Keywords

    • Bowel symptoms
    • Darolutamide
    • Hormonal treatment–related symptoms
    • Non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC)
    • Quality of life
    • Urinary symptoms

    OECD Field of Science

    • 3. Medical and Health Sciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Darolutamide and health-related quality of life in patients with non-metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: An analysis of the phase III ARAMIS trial'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this