Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies

  • Davide Geneletti
  • , Blal Adem Esmail*
  • , Chiara Cortinovis
  • , Ildikó Arany
  • , Mario Balzan
  • , Pieter van Beukering
  • , Sabine Bicking
  • , Paulo A.V. Borges
  • , Bilyana Borisova
  • , Steven Broekx
  • , Benjamin Burkhard
  • , Artur Gil
  • , Ola Inghe
  • , Leena Kopperoinen
  • , Marion Kruse
  • , Inge Liekens
  • , Damian Lowicki
  • , Andrzej Mizgajski
  • , Sara Mulder
  • , Stoyan Nedkov
  • Hannah Ostergard, Ana Picanço, Anda Ruskule, Fernando Santos-Martín, Ina M. Sieber, Johan Svensson, Dava Vačkářů, Kristina Veidemane
*Corresponding author for this work
  • University of Trento
  • Centre for Ecological Research
  • Malta College of Arts, Science & Technology
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Kiel University
  • Leibniz University Hannover
  • cE3c – Centre for Ecology
  • University of the Azores
  • Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski
  • Flemish Institute for Technological Research
  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
  • CE3C—Centre for Ecology
  • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  • Finnish Environment Institute
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  • FSD
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • Baltic Environmental Forum
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • CZECHGLOBE Global Change Research Institute
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Baltic Environmental Forum-Latvia BEF-LV

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

55 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy-and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere53111
Pages (from-to)1-31
Number of pages31
JournalOne Ecosystem
Volume5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Biodiversity
  • Case studies
  • Comparative analysis
  • EU Biodiversity Strategy
  • Ecosystem services
  • MAES

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this