Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Efficient quantum algorithms for (Gapped) group testing and junta testing

  • Centrum voor Wiskunde en Informatica
  • New York University
  • University of Amsterdam

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperResearchpeer-review

38 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the k-junta testing problem, a tester has to efficiently decide whether a given function f: {0,1}n → {0,1} is a k-junta (i.e., depends on at most k of its input bits) or is ∈-far from any k-junta. Our main result is a quantum algorithm for this problem with query complexity Ō(√∈) and time complexity Ō(n√∈). This quadratically improves over the query complexity of the previous best quantum junta tester, due to Atici and Servedio. Our tester is based on a new quantum algorithm for a gapped version of the combinatorial group testing problem, with an up to quartic improvement over the query complexity of the best classical algorithm. For our upper bound on the time complexity we give a near-linear time implementation of a shallow variant of the quantum Fourier transform over the symmetric group, similar to the Schur-Weyl transform. We also prove a lower bound of ω(k1/3) queries for junta-testing (for constant ∈).

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication27th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2016
EditorsRobert Krauthgamer
PublisherAssociation for Computing Machinery
Pages903-922
Number of pages20
ISBN (Electronic)9781510819672
Publication statusPublished - 2016
Event27th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2016 - Arlington, United States
Duration: 10 Jan 201612 Jan 2016

Publication series

NameProceedings of the Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms
Volume2

Conference

Conference27th Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, SODA 2016
Country/TerritoryUnited States
CityArlington
Period10/01/1612/01/16

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Efficient quantum algorithms for (Gapped) group testing and junta testing'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this