Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Electrochemical Etching vs. Electrochemical Deposition: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis

  • Yana Suchikova*
  • , Serhii Nazarovets
  • , Anatolijs Popovs
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Berdyansk State Pedagogical University
  • Borys Grinchenko Kyiv University

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This study presents a comprehensive bibliometric analysis of scientific publications on electrochemical etching and electrochemical deposition from 1970 to 2023. Using the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCIE) database, we analysed 5166 publications on electrochemical etching and, 30,759 publications on electrochemical deposition. The analysis reveals distinct yet interconnected research landscapes for these two techniques. Electrochemical etching research has focused on themes such as porous silicon, photoluminescence, and applications in photonics, while electrochemical deposition research has centred on energy storage, catalysis, and biosensing applications. Keyword co-occurrence analysis illustrates the progression from fundamental studies to specialised applications in both fields. This study highlights the importance of international collaboration and provides insights into the historical and contemporary advancements in electrochemical methods for nanomaterial synthesis. The findings underscore the complementary nature of electrochemical etching and deposition, driving innovation and offering new opportunities in materials science and technology.

Original languageEnglish
Article number18
JournalElectrochem
Volume6
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2025

Keywords

  • applications
  • electrochemical deposition
  • electrochemical etching
  • nanomaterial synthesis
  • research landscapes

OECD Field of Science

  • 1.3 Physical Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Electrochemical Etching vs. Electrochemical Deposition: A Comparative Bibliometric Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this