Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Environmental risk assessment studies on new plant protection products which have been elaborated from coniferous tree bark

  • L. Jankevica*
  • , O. Polis
  • , A. Korica
  • , I. Samsone
  • , V. Laugale
  • , M. Daugavietis
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Latvian State Forest Research Institute Silava
  • Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Nowadays there are still various chemical pesticides being applied in the course of ensuring plant protection. Since 2010, we have been working on the development of new, environmentally-friendly plant protection products which will provide an effective tool against pathogenic fungi and bacteria which cause disease in crop plants. The specific aim of this study was to evaluate a risk assessment for new plant protection products that have been elaborated on the basis of coniferous tree bark. Various products were tested which are extracted during the processing of wood bark from pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) and spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.). Ethanol extracts were formulated and applied during these experiments. Two formulations, which showed anti-fungal activity in vitro and in field trials on fruit crops (involving strawberries and raspberries) were selected for the risk assessment studies. The impact was studied of formulation treatment on crop plants and soil biological activity, and the accumulation of residues of active substances in crop plants and soil. The application of new formulations did not show any negative effect on the chlorophyll content and the chlorophyll fluorescence of plant leaves. The results showed that pine and spruce bark extract formulations contain active compounds (coumaric acid, quercetin, epicatechin, and ferulic acid) within the range of 5.1-5.9 mg kg-1 and 11.1-443.9 mg kg-1 respectively. The amount of active substances which were determined in most cases was higher in the spruce bark extract formulation when compared to the pine bark extract formulation. Our results confirmed the presence of active compounds-epicatechin, quercetin, and coumaric acid-in strawberry fruits which remained untreated and in those that were treated with spruce ethanol extract formulation. Untreated raspberry fruits contained all four active substances within the range of 81-5,300 µg kg-1. We observed a significant increase of coumaric acid and quercetin in raspberries after their having been treated with spruce bark extract formulation in a 2% concentration, P < 0.05, and did not find any negative impact for spruce bark extract formulations when used on soil microbial biomass.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2056-2067
Number of pages12
JournalAgronomy Research
Volume16
Issue number5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

OECD Field of Science

  • 1.6 Biological Sciences

Keywords

  • Coumaric acid
  • Epicatechin
  • Ferulic acid
  • Pine bark ethanol extract
  • Quercetin
  • Raspberry
  • Residues in soil and plants
  • Spruce bark ethanol extract
  • Strawberry

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Environmental risk assessment studies on new plant protection products which have been elaborated from coniferous tree bark'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this