Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evar using the nellix sac-anchoring endoprosthesis: Treatment of favourable and adverse anatomy

  • D. K. Krievins
  • , A. Holden
  • , J. Savlovskis
  • , C. Calderas
  • , C. E. Donayre
  • , F. L. Moll
  • , B. Katzen
  • , C. K. Zarins*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
  • Auckland District Health Board
  • Instituto de Clinicas Y Urologia Tamanaco
  • University of California at Los Angeles
  • Utrecht University
  • Baptist Hospital Miami
  • Stanford University

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

125 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objective: The study aimed to review the results of endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) using a novel sac-anchoring endoprosthesis in patients with favourable and adverse anatomy. Design: This is a prospective, multicentre, clinical trial. Materials: The Nellix endoprosthesis consists of dual, balloon-expandable endoframes, surrounded by polymer-filled endobags, which obliterate the aneurysm sac and maintain endograft position. Methods: The study reviewed worldwide clinical experience and Core Lab evaluation of computed tomography (CT) scans. Results: From 2008 to 2010, 34 patients (age 71 ± 8 years, abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) diameter 5.8 ± 0.8 cm) were treated at four clinical sites. Seventeen patients (50%) met the inclusion criteria for Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved endografts (favourable anatomy); 17 (50%) had one or more adverse anatomic feature: neck length <10 mm (24%), neck angle >60° (9%) and iliac diameter >23 mm (38%). Device deployment was successful in all patients; iliac aneurysm treatment preserved hypogastric patency. Perioperative mortality was 1/34 (2.9%); one patient died at 10 months of congestive heart failure (CHF); one patient had a secondary procedure at 15 months. During 15 ± 6 months follow-up, there were no differences in outcome between favourable and adverse anatomy patients. Follow-up CT extending up to 2 years revealed no change in aneurysm size or endograft position and no new endoleaks. Conclusions: Favourable and adverse anatomy patients can be successfully treated using the Nellix sac-anchoring endoprosthesis. Early results are promising but longer-term studies are needed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)38-46
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Volume42
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Abdominal aortic aneurysm
  • Adverse aortic anatomy
  • Clinical results of EVAR with new endovascular device
  • Endovascular aortic aneurysm repair
  • New device for EVAR
  • Novel sac-anchoring endoprosthesis

OECD Field of Science

  • 3. Medical and Health Sciences

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evar using the nellix sac-anchoring endoprosthesis: Treatment of favourable and adverse anatomy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this