Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Final five-year results of the REMEDEE Registry: Real-world experience with the dual-therapy COMBO stent

  • Laura S.M. Kerkmeijer
  • , Jaya Chandrasekhar
  • , Deborah N. Kalkman
  • , Pier Woudstra
  • , Ian B.A. Menown
  • , Harry Suryapranata
  • , Peter den Heijer
  • , Andrés Iñiguez
  • , Arnoud W.J. van 't Hof
  • , Andrejs Erglis
  • , Karin E. Arkenbout
  • , Philippe Muller
  • , Karel T. Koch
  • , Jan G. Tijssen
  • , Marcel A.M. Beijk
  • , Robbert J. de Winter*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Amsterdam UMC
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Craigavon Cardiac Centre
  • Radboud University Nijmegen
  • Amphia Hospital
  • Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro - Complejo Hospitalario Universitario
  • Isala Clinics
  • Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
  • Tergooi Ziekenhuis
  • Institut National de Cardiochirurgie et de Cardiologie Interventionnelle

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Objectives: This final report from the REMEDEE Registry assessed the long-term safety and efficacy of the dual-therapy COMBO stent in a large unselected patient population. Background: The bio-engineered COMBO stent (OrbusNeich Medical BV, The Netherlands) is a dual-therapy pro-healing stent. Data of long-term safety and efficacy of the this stent is lacking. Methods: The prospective, multicenter, investigator-initiated REMEDEE Registry evaluated clinical outcomes after COMBO stent implantation in daily clinical practice. One thousand patients were enrolled between June 2013 and March 2014. Results: Five-year follow-up data were obtained in 97.2% of patients. At 5-years, target lesion failure (TLF) (composite of cardiac death, target-vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) was present in 145 patients (14.8%). Definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 0.9%, with no additional case beyond 3-years of follow-up. In males, 5-year TLF-rate was 15.6 versus 12.6% in females (p =.22). Patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) had TLF-rate of 11.4%, noninsulin-treated DM 22.7% (p =.001) and insulin-treated DM 41.2% (p <.001). Patients presenting with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) had higher incidence of TLF compared to non-ACS (20.4 vs. 13.3%; p =.008), while incidence with STE-ACS was comparable to non-ACS (10.7 vs. 13.3%; p =.43). Conclusion: Percutaneous coronary intervention with the dual-therapy COMBO stent in unselected patient population shows low rates of TLF and ST to 5 years. Remarkably, no case of ST was noted beyond 3 years.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)503-510
Number of pages8
JournalCatheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Volume98
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2021
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • drug-eluting stent
  • dual-therapy stent
  • percutaneous coronary intervention

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Final five-year results of the REMEDEE Registry: Real-world experience with the dual-therapy COMBO stent'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this