Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

High-risk individuals for gastric cancer would be missed for surveillance without subtyping of intestinal metaplasia

  • Sergejs Isajevs*
  • , Selga Savčenko
  • , Inta Liepniece-Karele
  • , Maria Blanca Piazuelo
  • , Ilze Kikuste
  • , Ivars Tolmanis
  • , Aigars Vanags
  • , Indra Gulbe
  • , Linda Mežmale
  • , Darhan Samentaev
  • , Altynbek Tazedinov
  • , Ramis Samsutdinov
  • , Tatjana Belihina
  • , Nurbek Igissinov
  • , Mārcis Leja
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Riga East University Hospital
  • University of Latvia
  • Vanderbilt University
  • Digestive Diseases Centre GASTRO
  • Regional Oncology Centre
  • Regional Diagnostic Centre
  • Central Asian Cancer Institute

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The use of Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment (OLGA) and Operative Link on Gastritis Assessment based on Intestinal Metaplasia (OLGIM) staging system is recommended for identifying subjects at risk for developing gastric cancer; usually high-risk lesions are considered only as stages III and IV. Accumulating evidence suggests that incomplete intestinal metaplasia (IM) is important in the development of gastric cancer. Our aim has been to identify the prevalence of incomplete IM in patients with low-risk OLGA/OLGIM stages among a high-risk general population. Healthy adult volunteers aged 40–64 years were invited to undergo upper endoscopy within a regional GISTAR pilot study in Kazakhstan (n = 166). Gastric lesions were staged according to OLGA/OLGIM staging system. High iron diamine–alcian blue (HID-AB) was used for subtyping IM. IM prevalence overall was 45.8%. Incomplete IM was present in 52.6% (type II in 30.3% and type III in 22.3%), whereas complete IM was found in 47.4% individuals. The prevalence of OLGIM I and II stage were 39.8 and 4.8%, respectively, whereas OLGIM III was observed in 1.2%. The prevalence of incomplete IM in patients stratified to OLGIM I was 54.5% (type II in 31.8% and type III in 22.7%). High prevalence of incomplete IM was detected not only in subjects with extensive IM, but in those stratified as at the OLGIM I stage. Without IM subtyping, patients with high risk of gastric cancer development would be missed for surveillance.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)679-686
JournalVirchows Archiv
Volume479
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

OECD Field of Science

  • 3. Medical and Health Sciences

Keywords

  • Gastric cancer
  • OLGA
  • OLGIM intestinal metaplasia
  • Risk stratification
  • Subtypes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'High-risk individuals for gastric cancer would be missed for surveillance without subtyping of intestinal metaplasia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this