TY - JOUR
T1 - Hybrid, infection- and vaccination-induced protection against laboratory- confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in a European multi-centre prospective cohort of healthcare workers, 2021–2024
AU - VEBIS HCW VE study group
AU - Rojas-Castro, Madelyn
AU - Mulchandani, Ranya
AU - Brolin, Kim
AU - Makarić, Zvjezdana Lovrić
AU - Uusküla, Anneli
AU - Bergin, Colm
AU - Fleming, Catherine
AU - Bonfanti, Paolo
AU - Murri, Rita
AU - Zvirbulis, Viesturs
AU - Zavadska, Dace
AU - Szuldrzynski, Konstanty
AU - Gaio, Vânia
AU - Popescu, Corneliu Petru
AU - Craiu, Mihai
AU - Hrișcă, Raluca Maria
AU - Cisneros, Maria
AU - Latorre-Millán, Miriam
AU - Petrović, Goranka
AU - Lohur, Liss
AU - McGrath, Jonathan
AU - Ferguson, Lauren
AU - Spolti, Anna
AU - De Gaetano Donati, Katleen
AU - Abolina, Ilze
AU - Gravele, Dagne
AU - Machado, Ausenda
AU - Florescu, Simin Aysel
AU - Lazar, Mihaela
AU - Subirats, Pilar
AU - Clusa, Laura
AU - Sarajlić, Gordan
AU - Sui, Jacklyn
AU - Kenny, Claire
AU - Santangelo, Rosaria
AU - Krievins, Dainis
AU - Barzdina, Elza Anna
AU - Henriques, Camila Valadas
AU - Kosa, Alma Gabriela
AU - Pohrib, Săftica Mariana
AU - Miron, Victor Daniel
AU - Muñoz-Almagro, Carmen
AU - Milagro, Ana Maria
AU - Bacci, Sabrina
AU - Savulescu, Camelia
AU - Nardone, Antony
AU - Prats, Albert
AU - López, Cristina
AU - Ganser, Iris
AU - Pozo, Francisco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025/12
Y1 - 2025/12
N2 - Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) face high occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and are a priority group for vaccination. Both natural infection and vaccination—individually or combined as hybrid immunity—confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study aimed to evaluate the protection conferred by hybrid, infection-induced, and booster vaccine-induced immunity against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in HCWs during the circulation of three pandemic and one post-pandemic Omicron sublineages. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of HCWs from 18 hospitals across nine European countries. Participants underwent RT-PCR testing at enrolment and during weekly or fortnightly follow-ups. The study period was divided based on dominant Omicron sublineage circulation: BA.1/2 (Dec 16, 2021–Jun 1, 2022), BA.4/5/BQ.1 (Jun 2–Dec 31, 2022), BA.2/XBB (Jan 1–May 2, 2023), and post-pandemic XBB.1.5/BA.2.86 (Sep 1, 2023–May 21, 2024). Participants were classified into four groups: hybrid (prior infection and recent booster vaccination 7–179 days), infection-induced (prior infection, no recent vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (recent booster vaccination, no prior infection), and a reference group (no prior infection, no recent booster vaccination). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for infection were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for hospital, age, sex, chronic condition, and patient-facing role. Results: A total of 3 133 HCWs were included: 2572 (82%) female, 1734 (55%) aged 40–59, and 563 (29%) with ≥ 1 chronic condition. Hybrid immunity showed significant protection during BA.1/2 (aHR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.21–0.63), BA.4/5/BQ.1 (aHR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.22–0.58), and XBB.1.5/BA.2.86 (aHR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.37–0.74) periods. Infection-induced immunity was protective across all periods, most during BA.1/2 (aHR = 0.26, 95%CI 0.12–0.53), and least during BA.2/XBB (aHR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.36–1.22). Vaccine-induced immunity alone offered limited protection during BA.1/2 (aHR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.49–1.06) and BA.4/5/BQ.1 (aHR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.50–1.19), with wide confidence intervals suggesting low statistical significance. Conclusions: Hybrid and infection-induced immunity groups were more protected against infection caused by earlier Omicron sub-lineages and more protected than vaccination alone, which had no significant protective effect. These findings highlight the need for adaptive public health strategies, including timely vaccine updates and understanding of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection to inform COVID-19 vaccination policies for HCWs in the post-pandemic era.
AB - Background: Healthcare workers (HCWs) face high occupational exposure to SARS-CoV-2 and are a priority group for vaccination. Both natural infection and vaccination—individually or combined as hybrid immunity—confer protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection. This study aimed to evaluate the protection conferred by hybrid, infection-induced, and booster vaccine-induced immunity against laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infections in HCWs during the circulation of three pandemic and one post-pandemic Omicron sublineages. Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study of HCWs from 18 hospitals across nine European countries. Participants underwent RT-PCR testing at enrolment and during weekly or fortnightly follow-ups. The study period was divided based on dominant Omicron sublineage circulation: BA.1/2 (Dec 16, 2021–Jun 1, 2022), BA.4/5/BQ.1 (Jun 2–Dec 31, 2022), BA.2/XBB (Jan 1–May 2, 2023), and post-pandemic XBB.1.5/BA.2.86 (Sep 1, 2023–May 21, 2024). Participants were classified into four groups: hybrid (prior infection and recent booster vaccination 7–179 days), infection-induced (prior infection, no recent vaccination), vaccine-induced immunity (recent booster vaccination, no prior infection), and a reference group (no prior infection, no recent booster vaccination). Adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for infection were estimated using Cox regression, adjusting for hospital, age, sex, chronic condition, and patient-facing role. Results: A total of 3 133 HCWs were included: 2572 (82%) female, 1734 (55%) aged 40–59, and 563 (29%) with ≥ 1 chronic condition. Hybrid immunity showed significant protection during BA.1/2 (aHR = 0.37, 95%CI 0.21–0.63), BA.4/5/BQ.1 (aHR = 0.36, 95%CI 0.22–0.58), and XBB.1.5/BA.2.86 (aHR = 0.53, 95%CI 0.37–0.74) periods. Infection-induced immunity was protective across all periods, most during BA.1/2 (aHR = 0.26, 95%CI 0.12–0.53), and least during BA.2/XBB (aHR = 0.66, 95%CI 0.36–1.22). Vaccine-induced immunity alone offered limited protection during BA.1/2 (aHR = 0.72, 95%CI 0.49–1.06) and BA.4/5/BQ.1 (aHR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.50–1.19), with wide confidence intervals suggesting low statistical significance. Conclusions: Hybrid and infection-induced immunity groups were more protected against infection caused by earlier Omicron sub-lineages and more protected than vaccination alone, which had no significant protective effect. These findings highlight the need for adaptive public health strategies, including timely vaccine updates and understanding of prior SARS-CoV-2 infection to inform COVID-19 vaccination policies for HCWs in the post-pandemic era.
KW - COVID-19 vaccination
KW - Healthcare workers
KW - Hybrid immunity
KW - Omicron variant
KW - Prospective cohort study
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105026323889
U2 - 10.1186/s12916-025-04503-2
DO - 10.1186/s12916-025-04503-2
M3 - Article
C2 - 41466249
AN - SCOPUS:105026323889
SN - 1741-7015
VL - 23
JO - BMC Medicine
JF - BMC Medicine
IS - 1
M1 - 697
ER -