Implementation of the Electronic Case System from the Perspective of Dialogue between Constitutional Bodies

This article presents a critical overview of Latvia’s implementation of the electronic case system, analysed through the lens of dialogue among constitutional bodies considering both the principle of interinstitutional loyalty and the principle of good lawmaking. It traces the reform’s trajectory from its inception in the early 2010s to the most recent legislative amendments, evaluating how those bodies have delineated and communicated their respective competences, duties and procedural entitlements during implementation. Based on doctrinal analysis and indepth interviews, the authors find that the dialogue with the judiciary has, to date, remained predominantly formalistic.