Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Implementing the EU MSP Directive: Current status and lessons learned in 22 EU Member States

  • Jacek Zaucha
  • , Kira Gee
  • , Emiliano Ramieri
  • , Leila Neimane*
  • , Neil Alloncle
  • , Nerijus Blažauskas
  • , Helena Calado
  • , Cristina Cervera-Núñez
  • , Vesna Marohnić Kuzmanović
  • , Margarita Stancheva
  • , Joanna Witkowska
  • , Sigrid Eskeland Schütz
  • , Juan Ronco Zapatero
  • , Charles N. Ehler
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Gdynia Maritime University // University of Gda?sk
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Institute of Legal Science
  • University of Bergen
  • Ministry for Ecological and Inclusive Transition
  • Klaip?da University
  • University of the Azores
  • CSIC)
  • Independent Researcher
  • Center for Coastal and Marine Study (CCMS)
  • Maritime University in Gdynia
  • Ocean Visions Consulting

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper takes stock of the impact the Maritime Spatial Planning Directive 2014/89/EU has had on developing maritime spatial planning (MSP) practice in Europe. Drawing on the practical experience of 22 Member States, it analyses how countries with varying political, planning and regional contexts, as well as varying MSP experience prior to 2014, have chosen to implement the Directive and what lessons they have learned in the process. A key lesson is that while the Directive provides a normative framework for approaching MSP, this has been variously adapted to national contexts. MSP in Europe is thus characterised by varied territorial coverage of plans, different national institutional arrangements for MSP, a variety of planning processes, and a variety of sectors covered by maritime spatial plans. We then examine four topics that are likely to remain prominent in future MSP, namely: • taking account of climate change, • applying the ecosystem approach, • considering social and community impact of MSP and • improving coherence. While planners identify a range of challenges associated with each of these topics, countries have also developed practical solutions, although these are constrained by the respective remit and capacity of MSP as a process. The sheer diversity of maritime spatial plans and approaches, differing overall visions for MSP and methodological challenges, such as cumulative or socio-economic impact assessment, feature among the key challenges for achieving greater coherence in MSP within sea basins and beyond.

Original languageEnglish
Article number106425
JournalMarine Policy
Volume171
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 8 - Decent Work and Economic Growth
    SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  3. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Coherence
  • Ecosystem approach
  • EU MSP Directive
  • Land-sea interaction
  • Maritime spatial planning
  • MSP implementation

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Implementing the EU MSP Directive: Current status and lessons learned in 22 EU Member States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this