Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Integer complexity: Experimental and analytical results II

  • University of Latvia

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

We consider representing natural numbers by expressions using only 1’s, addition, multiplication and parentheses. Let ||n|| denote the minimum number of 1’s in the expressions representing n. The logarithmic complexity ||n||log is defined to be ||n||/log3 n. The values of ||n||log are located in the segment [3, 4.755], but almost nothing is known with certainty about the structure of this “spectrum” (are the values dense somewhere in the segment?, etc.).We establish a connection between this problem and another difficult problem: the seemingly “almost random” behaviour of digits in the base-3 representation of the numbers 2n. We also consider representing natural numbers by expressions that include subtraction.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationDescriptional Complexity of Formal Systems - 17th International Workshop, DCFS 2015, Proceedings
EditorsAlexander Okhotin, Jeffrey Shallit
PublisherSpringer Verlag
Pages58-69
Number of pages12
ISBN (Print)9783319192246
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
Event17th International Workshop on Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems, DCFS 2015 - Waterloo, Canada
Duration: 25 Jun 201527 Jun 2015

Publication series

NameLecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)
Volume9118
ISSN (Print)0302-9743
ISSN (Electronic)1611-3349

Conference

Conference17th International Workshop on Descriptional Complexity of Formal Systems, DCFS 2015
Country/TerritoryCanada
CityWaterloo
Period25/06/1527/06/15

Keywords

  • Integer complexity
  • Logarithmic complexity
  • Powers of two
  • Spectrum
  • Ternary representations

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Integer complexity: Experimental and analytical results II'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this