Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Investigating the Physics of Tokamak Global Stability with Interpretable Machine Learning Tools

  • Līga Avotiņa (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Larisa Baumane (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Dāvis Čonka (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Mihails Haļitovs (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Ieva Igaune (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Juris Jansons (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Gunta Ķizāne (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Ričards Kovaldins (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Andris Leščinskis (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Broņislavs Leščinskis (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Elīna Pajuste (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Aigars Vītiņš (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Artūrs Zariņš (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Roberts Zariņš (Member of the Working Group)
  • , Murari Andrea
  • , JET Contributors

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    20 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    The inadequacies of basic physics models for disruption prediction have induced the community to increasingly rely on data mining tools. In the last decade, it has been shown how machine learning predictors can achieve a much better performance than those obtained with manually identified thresholds or empirical descriptions of the plasma stability limits. The main criticisms of these techniques focus therefore on two different but interrelated issues: poor "physics fidelity" and limited interpretability. Insufficient "physics fidelity" refers to the fact that the mathematical models of most data mining tools do not reflect the physics of the underlying phenomena. Moreover, they implement a black box approach to learning, which results in very poor interpretability of their outputs. To overcome or at least mitigate these limitations, a general methodology has been devised and tested, with the objective of combining the predictive capability of machine learning tools with the expression of the operational boundary in terms of traditional equations more suited to understanding the underlying physics. The proposed approach relies on the application of machine learning classifiers (such as Support Vector Machines or Classification Trees) and Symbolic Regression via Genetic Programming directly to experimental databases. The results are very encouraging. The obtained equations of the boundary between the safe and disruptive regions of the operational space present almost the same performance as the machine learning classifiers, based on completely independent learning techniques. Moreover, these models possess significantly better predictive power than traditional representations, such as the Hugill or the beta limit. More importantly, they are realistic and intuitive mathematical formulas, which are well suited to supporting theoretical understanding and to benchmarking empirical models. They can also be deployed easily and efficiently in real-time feedback systems.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number6683
    JournalApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
    Volume10
    Issue number19
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2020

    OECD Field of Science

    • 1.3 Physical Sciences

    Keywords

    • Classification and regression trees (CART)
    • Data-driven theory
    • Disruptions
    • Ensemble of classifiers
    • Knowledge discovery
    • prediction
    • Support vector machines
    • Symbolic regression

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Investigating the Physics of Tokamak Global Stability with Interpretable Machine Learning Tools'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this