Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration

  • Benjamin Burkhard*
  • , Joachim Maes
  • , Marion B. Potschin-Young
  • , Fernando Santos-Martín
  • , Davide Geneletti
  • , Pavel Stoev
  • , Leena Kopperoinen
  • , Cristian Mihai Adamescu
  • , Blal Adem Esmail
  • , Ildikó Arany
  • , Andy Arnell
  • , Mario Balzan
  • , David N. Barton
  • , Pieter Van Beukering
  • , Sabine Bicking
  • , Paulo Alexandre Vieira Borges
  • , Bilyana Borisova
  • , Leon Braat
  • , Luke M. Brander
  • , Svetla Bratanova-Doncheva
  • Steven Broekx, Claire Brown, Constantin Cazacu, Neville Crossman, Bálint Czúcz, Jan Danĕk, Rudolf de Groot, Daniel Depellegrin, Panayotis Dimopoulos, Nora Elvinger, Markus Erhard, Nora Fagerholm, Jana Frélichová, Adrienne Grêt-Regamey, Margarita Grudova, Roy Haines-Young, Ola Inghe, Tamas Kristof Kallay, Tamara Kirin, Hermann Klug, Ioannis P. Kokkoris, Iskra Konovska, Marion Kruse, Iliyana41 Kuzmova, Manfred Lange, Inge Liekens, Alon Lotan, Damian Lowicki, Sandra Luque, Cristina Marta-Pedroso, Andrzej Mizgajski, Laura Mononen, Sara Mulder, Felix Müller, Stoyan Nedkov, Mariana Nikolova, Hannah Östergård, Lyubomir Penev, Paulo Pereira, Kati Pitkänen, Tobias Plieninger, Sven Erik Rabe, Steffen Reichel, Philip K. Roche, Graciela Rusch, Anda Ruskule, Anna41 Sapundzhieva, Kalev Sepp, Ina Maren Sieber, Mateja Šmid Hribar, Simona Stašová, Bastian Steinhoff-Knopp, Małgorzata Stępniewska, Anne Teller, David Vackar, Martine Van Weelden, Kristina Veidemane, Henrik Vejre, Petteri Vihervaara, Arto Viinikka, Miguel Villoslada, Bettina Weibel, Grazia Zulian
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Leibniz University Hannover
  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • Fabis Consulting Ltd.
  • Universidad Autónoma de Madrid
  • University of Trento
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • Finnish Environment Institute
  • University of Bucharest
  • Centre for Ecological Research
  • UNEP-WCMC
  • Malta College of Arts, Science & Technology
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Kiel University
  • CE3C - Centre for Ecology
  • University of the Azores
  • Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Institute for Environmental Studies
  • The University of Hong Kong
  • Flemish Institute for Technological Research
  • CSIRO
  • Muséum national d'histoire naturelle
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Mykolas Romeris University
  • Department of Biology
  • University of Patras
  • Ministry for Sustainable Development and Infrastructure
  • European Environment Agency, Denmark
  • University of Copenhagen
  • Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich
  • Pensoft
  • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  • Regional Environmental Center for Central and Eastern Europe
  • Croatian Agency for the Environment and Nature
  • University of Salzburg
  • Foundation for Sustainable Development
  • The Cyprus Institute
  • Tel Aviv University
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  • INRAE
  • University of Lisbon
  • University of Göttingen
  • IRSTEA
  • Baltic Environmental Forum
  • Estonian University of Life Sciences
  • Scientific Research Centre of the Slovenian Academy of Sciences and Arts
  • Biodiversity and Landscape Protection Directorate Ministry of Environment
  • Nature
  • European Commission
  • Baltic Environmental Forum-Latvia BEF-LV

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

48 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The European Union (EU) Horizon 2020 Coordination and Support Action ESMERALDA aimed at developing guidance and a flexible methodology for Mapping and Assessment of Ecosystems and their Services (MAES) to support the EU member states in the implementation of the EU Biodiversity Strategy’s Target 2 Action 5. ESMERALDA’s key tasks included network creation, stakeholder engagement, enhancing ecosystem services mapping and assessment methods across various spatial scales and value domains, work in case studies and support of EU member states in MAES implementation. Thus ESMERALDA aimed at integrating various project outcomes around four major strands: i) Networking, ii) Policy, iii) Research and iv) Application. The objective was to provide guidance for integrated ecosystem service mapping and assessment that can be used for sustainable decision-making in policy, business, society, practice and science at EU, national and regional levels. This article presents the overall ESMERALDA approach of integrating the above-mentioned project components and outcomes and provides an overview of how the enhanced methods were applied and how they can be used to support MAES implementation in the EU member states. Experiences with implementing such a large pan-European Coordination and Support Action in the context of EU policy are discussed and recommendations for future actions are given.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere29153
JournalOne Ecosystem
Volume3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2018

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
    SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production
  2. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
  3. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

Keywords

  • Assessment
  • EU biodiversity strategy to 2020
  • Ecosystem services
  • Mapping
  • Project

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Mapping and assessing ecosystem services in the EU - Lessons learned from the ESMERALDA approach of integration'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this