Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Marine and coastal ecosystem services on the science-policy-practice nexus: Challenges and opportunities from 11 European case studies

  • Evangelia G. Drakou*
  • , Charlène Kermagoret
  • , Camino Liquete
  • , Ana Ruiz-Frau
  • , Kremena Burkhard
  • , Ana I. Lillebø
  • , Alexander P.E. van Oudenhoven
  • , Johanna Ballé-Béganton
  • , João Garcia Rodrigues
  • , Emmi Nieminen
  • , Soile Oinonen
  • , Alex Ziemba
  • , Elena Gissi
  • , Daniel Depellegrin
  • , Kristina Veidemane
  • , Anda Ruskule
  • , Justine Delangue
  • , Anne Böhnke-Henrichs
  • , Arjen Boon
  • , Richard Wenning
  • Simone Martino, Berit Hasler, Mette Termansen, Mark Rockel, Herman Hummel, Ghada El Serafy, Plamen Peev
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Université de Bretagne Occidentale
  • University of Twente
  • European Commission Joint Research Centre
  • IMEDEA (CSIC-UIB)
  • Leibniz University Hannover
  • University of Aveiro
  • Leiden University
  • University of Santiago de Compostela
  • Finnish Environment Institute
  • Deltares
  • Università Iuav di Venezia
  • National Research Council of Italy
  • Baltic Environmental Forum
  • French Committee of IUCN
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Ramboll Foundation
  • Dunstaffnage Marine Laboratory
  • Aarhus University
  • Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research - NIOZ
  • BlueLink Foundation

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

63 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We compared and contrasted 11 European case studies to identify challenges and opportunities toward the operationalization of marine and coastal ecosystem service (MCES) assessments in Europe. This work is the output of a panel convened by the Marine Working Group of the Ecosystem Services Partnership in September 2016. The MCES assessments were used to (1) address multiple policy objectives simultaneously, (2) interpret EU-wide policies to smaller scales and (3) inform local decision-making. Most of the studies did inform decision makers, but only in a few cases, the outputs were applied or informed decision-making. Significant limitations among the 11 assessments were the absence of shared understanding of the ES concept, data and knowledge gaps, difficulties in accounting for marine social-ecological systems complexity and partial stakeholder involvement. The findings of the expert panel call for continuous involvement of MCES ‘end users’, integrated knowledge on marine social-ecological systems, defining thresholds to MCES use and raising awareness to the general public. Such improvements at the intersection of science, policy and practice are essential starting points toward building a stronger science foundation supporting management of European marine ecosystems.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)51-67
Number of pages17
JournalInternational Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystems Services and Management
Volume13
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 29 Nov 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • Bottom-up approach
  • Data gaps
  • Ocean literacy
  • Pan-European approach
  • Policy relevance
  • Uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Marine and coastal ecosystem services on the science-policy-practice nexus: Challenges and opportunities from 11 European case studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this