TY - JOUR
T1 - Quality of Life After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention or Medical Therapy for Chronic Total Coronary Occlusions
AU - EUROCTO and DECISION-CTO Trial Investigators
AU - Werner, Gerald S.
AU - Kim, Ju Hyeun
AU - Hildick-Smith, David
AU - Kang, Do Yoon
AU - Yuste, Victoria Martin
AU - Ahn, Jung Min
AU - Boudou, Nicolas
AU - Park, Duk Woo
AU - Louvard, Yves
AU - Christiansen, Evald Høj
AU - Ērglis, Andrejs
AU - Rumoroso, Jose Ramon
AU - di Mario, Carlo
AU - Escaned, Javier
AU - Teruel, Luis
AU - Bufe, Alexander
AU - Park, Seung Jung
AU - Boudou, Nicolas
AU - Louvard, Yves
AU - Tchetche, Didier
AU - Leymarie, Jean Louis
AU - Martin-Yuste, Victoria
AU - Rumoroso, Jose Ramon
AU - Escaned, Javier
AU - Teruel, Luis
AU - Goicolea, Javier
AU - Serra, Antonio
AU - Hildick-Smith, David
AU - di Mario, Carlo
AU - Spratt, James C.
AU - Gershlick, Anthony H.
AU - Cotton, James
AU - Werner, Gerald S.
AU - Bufe, Alexander
AU - Lauer, Bernward
AU - Reifart, Nicolaus
AU - Büttner, Hans Joachim
AU - Gelev, Valeri
AU - Erglis, Andrejs
AU - Christiansen, Evald H.
AU - Giudice, Pietro
AU - Galassi, Alfredo R.
AU - Gagnor, Andrea
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2026 by the American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier.
PY - 2026/7/7
Y1 - 2026/7/7
N2 - Background: The benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTOs) to improve clinical symptoms and quality of life (QoL) as compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT) is still under debate because of the scarcity of available randomized trials (RCTs). Objectives: We evaluated the effect of PCI vs OMT in patients with a CTO and no concomitant coronary lesions in a post-hoc pooled analysis of 2 RCTs. Methods: A total of 518 patients with a single CTO and no other significant coronary lesion were extracted from 2 RCTs, EUROCTO and DECISION-CTO, which had compared PCI vs OMT. Randomization to PCI or OMT was 1:1 in DECISION and 2:1 in EUROCTO. The clinical status was assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at baseline and after 12 months, and clinical events were monitored for 3 years. Results: PCI was successful in 92.2%. On an intention-to-treat analysis, PCI appeared to be superior to OMT for the change of angina frequency scores between baseline and follow-up (12.2 vs 8.6; P = 0.009), QoL (19.5 vs 11.3; P < 0.001), and the SAQ summary score (13.8 vs 8.5; P < 0.001). For physical limitation, the difference was just at the level of the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests (P = 0.01). There was a wide variability of changes in SAQ scores. For QoL, the major determinant for a significant improvement was a low baseline score and the assignment to PCI, whereas gender, diabetes, or lesion complexity had no influence. During a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, the clinical endpoints of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were similar in both groups (OMT vs PCI: 2.7% vs 5.1%; P = 0.17). The rates of stroke or hospitalization for bleeding were similar, and only target lesion revascularizations were more frequent with OMT (18.8% vs 10.6%; P = 0.005). Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis from 2 RCTs of patients with a single CTO and no significant concomitant lesion, PCI achieved better improvement in QoL, angina frequency, and the SAQ summary score than OMT with no signal of excess harm regarding clinical endpoints.
AB - Background: The benefit of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for chronic total coronary occlusions (CTOs) to improve clinical symptoms and quality of life (QoL) as compared with optimal medical therapy (OMT) is still under debate because of the scarcity of available randomized trials (RCTs). Objectives: We evaluated the effect of PCI vs OMT in patients with a CTO and no concomitant coronary lesions in a post-hoc pooled analysis of 2 RCTs. Methods: A total of 518 patients with a single CTO and no other significant coronary lesion were extracted from 2 RCTs, EUROCTO and DECISION-CTO, which had compared PCI vs OMT. Randomization to PCI or OMT was 1:1 in DECISION and 2:1 in EUROCTO. The clinical status was assessed by the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ) at baseline and after 12 months, and clinical events were monitored for 3 years. Results: PCI was successful in 92.2%. On an intention-to-treat analysis, PCI appeared to be superior to OMT for the change of angina frequency scores between baseline and follow-up (12.2 vs 8.6; P = 0.009), QoL (19.5 vs 11.3; P < 0.001), and the SAQ summary score (13.8 vs 8.5; P < 0.001). For physical limitation, the difference was just at the level of the Bonferroni correction for multiple tests (P = 0.01). There was a wide variability of changes in SAQ scores. For QoL, the major determinant for a significant improvement was a low baseline score and the assignment to PCI, whereas gender, diabetes, or lesion complexity had no influence. During a mean follow-up of 3.1 years, the clinical endpoints of cardiac death or nonfatal myocardial infarction were similar in both groups (OMT vs PCI: 2.7% vs 5.1%; P = 0.17). The rates of stroke or hospitalization for bleeding were similar, and only target lesion revascularizations were more frequent with OMT (18.8% vs 10.6%; P = 0.005). Conclusions: In this post-hoc analysis from 2 RCTs of patients with a single CTO and no significant concomitant lesion, PCI achieved better improvement in QoL, angina frequency, and the SAQ summary score than OMT with no signal of excess harm regarding clinical endpoints.
KW - chronic coronary occlusion
KW - optimal medical therapy
KW - percutaneous transluminal intervention
KW - prognosis
UR - https://www.jacc.org/doi/10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5099
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105035638545
U2 - 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5099
DO - 10.1016/j.jacc.2026.02.5099
M3 - Article
C2 - 41949523
AN - SCOPUS:105035638545
SN - 0735-1097
VL - 88
SP - 24
EP - 37
JO - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
JF - Journal of the American College of Cardiology
IS - 1
ER -