Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Radiotherapy and diagnostic capacity in relation to the changing cancer burden in the Baltic States

  • Erika Korobeinikova*
  • , Kristaps Paļskis
  • , Manjit Dosanjh
  • , Freddie Bray
  • , Eduard Gershkevitsh
  • , Inga Balode
  • , Alvis Bernans
  • , Gaļina Boka
  • , Laimonas Jaruševičius
  • , Zanda Liepa
  • , Māris Mežeckis
  • , Aista Plieskienė
  • , Maija Radziņa
  • , Romas Skomskis
  • , Giedrė Smailytė
  • , Sandra Stepiņa
  • , Jonas Venius
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Lithuanian University of Health Sciences
  • CERN
  • University of Oxford
  • International Cancer Expert Corps
  • International Agency for Research on Cancer
  • North Estonia Medical Centre
  • Riga East University Hospital
  • Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
  • Stereotactic Radiosurgery Center "Sigulda"
  • Klaipėda University
  • Riga Stradins University
  • Republican Siauliai Hospital
  • National Cancer Institute
  • Liepaja Regional Hospital

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background and purpose: Cancer mortality rates in the Baltic States (Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania) exceeds the European Union (EU) average, in part due to limited access to radiation therapy (RT). We updated RT capacity and utilization to inform regional planning. Patient/material and methods: We conducted a census of all 11 RT centres (2016–2023) via a standardized questionnaire, cross-validated with national registries and international databases. We compared technology availability, workforce, and utilization with EU countries in relation to the present cancer burden and projections to 2050. This multicentre observational study adhered to STrengthening the Reporting of OBservational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. Results: Only 35–42% of cancer patients received RT, below the 50% recommendation. Linear accelerator availability ranged from 3.8 to 5.1 per million inhabitants, figures that are almost half those seen in EU countries with higher Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. While the use of intensity modulated RT, volumetric modulated arc therapy and stereotactic RT increased, staffing levels has remained static in recent years. Mortality-to-incidence ratio correlated negatively with GDP (r = –0.7) and RT capacity (r = –0.7). Interpretation: Despite technological progress in the Baltic States, major gaps persist in RT access and workforce levels. Baltic States still underperform compared to EU countries with higher GDP per capita in terms of equipment availability, workforce capacity, and overall cancer outcomes. Future-oriented strategic investments, based on regional collaboration and shared infrastructure are urgently needed, including the development of a regional particle therapy centre, to ensure equitable access to state-of-the art advanced cancer care across the Baltic States.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)355-362
JournalActa Oncologica
Volume65
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
  2. SDG 9 - Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
    SDG 9 Industry, Innovation, and Infrastructure
  3. SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals
    SDG 17 Partnerships for the Goals

OECD Field of Science

  • 3.2 Clinical Medicine

Keywords

  • Baltic States
  • Radiotherapy
  • health resources
  • health services accessibility
  • neoplasms
  • technology assessment, biomedical
  • workforce

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radiotherapy and diagnostic capacity in relation to the changing cancer burden in the Baltic States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this