Abstract
This paper examines the resistance of contemporary Latvian Lutheran clergy to the ordination of women, rooted in historical factors and theological conservatism. It discusses the impact of Latvia's tumultuous history on theological discourse, revealing how practical concerns and traditionalism influenced the decision against women's ordination. Through clergy interviews, it uncovers a range of arguments used to justify this stance, exposing elements of sexism and neoconservatism. The clergy's prioritization of community identity over societal progress is evident, as they align with hierarchical leadership and resist external influences. This study highlights the disconnect between theological tradition and modern ethics, illustrating how theology can justify discrimination and hinder societal advancement.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 23-44 |
| Number of pages | 22 |
| Journal | Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2024 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 5 Gender Equality
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'SACRED DISCRIMINATION: LATVIAN LUTHERAN CLERGY AGAINST WOMEN'S ORDINATION'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver