Abstract
Subsequently, the Baltic countries exhibited the most rapid economic growth among EU member states (see, for example, Hazans and Philips 2010, Section 7 for details). However, in the second part of 2008 both countries entered a deep recession. In 2009, both GDP and employment (full-time equivalents) were about 20 per cent below 2007 levels, while unemployment reached 14 per cent in Estonia and 17.5 per cent in Latvia (and further increased in 2010 to 17.3 per cent and 19 per cent, respectively). Despite this apparent similarity, Latvia was forced to apply for emergency financial assistance from the EU and the IMF, while Estonia, which created a stabilisation fund during the growth years, managed without external help and experienced much more modest wage cuts than Latvia (European Commission 2011: Figure I.3.1). Moreover, the crisis in Latvia is perceived by the majority of the population as a systemic, rather than just a financial crisis, which is not the case in Estonia. Table 6.1 illustrates these differences which, as we shall see, are well reflected in emigration patterns.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | EU Labour Migration in Troubled Times |
| Subtitle of host publication | Skills Mismatch, Return and Policy Responses |
| Publisher | Taylor and Francis |
| Pages | 169-208 |
| Number of pages | 40 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781317140238 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781409434504 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jan 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Selectivity of Migrants from Baltic Countries Before and After Enlargement and Responses to the Crisis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver