Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Susceptibilities of MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates to unconventional drugs compared with their reported pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters

  • for the Global PETTS Investigators
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Taiwan Centers for Disease Control
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Tropical Disease Foundation
  • Ministerio de Salud del Perú
  • Riga East University Hospital
  • Yonsei University
  • National Masan Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Vladimir Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary
  • Office of Disease Prevention and Control Region 7
  • Orel Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary
  • North-Estonia Regional Hospital
  • Eye Clinic of Tartu University Hospital
  • Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

27 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: The second-line drugs recommended to treat drug-resistant TB are toxic, expensive and difficult to procure. Given increasing resistance, the need for additional anti-TB drugs has become more urgent. But new drugs take time to develop and are expensive. Some commercially available drugs have reported antimycobacterial activity but are not routinely used because supporting laboratory and clinical evidence is sparse. Methods: We analysed 217 MDR M. tuberculosis isolates including 153 initial isolates from unique patients and 64 isolates from follow-up specimens during the course of treatment. The resazurinmicrodilution assaywas performed to determine MICs of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, mefloquine, thioridazine, clofazimine, amoxicillin/clavulanate, meropenem/clavulanate, nitazoxanide, linezolid and oxyphenbutazone. Isoniazid was used for validation. We calculated theMIC50 andMIC90 as theMICs atwhich growth of 50% and 90% of isolates was inhibited, respectively. Results: TheMIC50s, in mg/L, for initial isolateswere as follows: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 0.2/4;mefloquine, 8; thioridazine, 4; clofazimine, 0.25; amoxicillin/clavulanate, 16/8; meropenem/clavulanate, 1/2.5; nitazoxanide, 16; linezolid, 0.25; and oxyphenbutazone, 40. The MIC90s, in mg/L, for initial isolateswere as follows: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 0>4/8; mefloquine, 8; thioridazine, 8; clofazimine, 0.5; amoxicillin/clavulanate, 32/16; meropenem/clavulanate, 8/2.5; nitazoxanide, 16; linezolid, 0.25; and oxyphenbutazone, 60. By comparison, the MIC90 of isoniazid was > 4 mg/L, as expected. There was no evidence that previous treatment affected susceptibility to any drug. Conclusions: Most drugs demonstrated efficacy against M. tuberculosis. When these MICs are compared with the published pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of the respective drugs in humans, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, meropenem/clavulanate, linezolid, clofazimine and nitazoxanide appear promising and warrant further clinical investigation.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1678-1687
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Volume72
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jun 2017
Externally publishedYes

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Susceptibilities of MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates to unconventional drugs compared with their reported pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this