Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: A review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases

  • Marcel M. Lambrechts
  • , Frank Adriaensen
  • , Daniel R. Ardia
  • , Alexandr V. Artemyev
  • , Francisco Atiénzar
  • , Jerzy Bańbura
  • , Emilio Barba
  • , Jean Charles Bouvier
  • , Jordi Camprodon
  • , Caren B. Cooper
  • , Russell D. Dawson
  • , Marcel Eens
  • , Tapio Eeva
  • , Bruno Faivre
  • , Laszlo Z. Garamszegi
  • , Anne E. Goodenough
  • , Andrew G. Gosler
  • , Arnaud Grégoire
  • , Simon C. Griffith
  • , Lars Gustafsson
  • L. Scott Johnson, Wojciech Kania, Oskars Keišs, Paulo E. Llambias, Mark C. Mainwaring, Raivo Mänd, Bruno Massa, Tomasz D. Mazgajski, Anders Pape Møller, Juan Moreno, Beat Naef-Daenzer, Jan Ke Nilsson, Ana C. Norte, Markku Orell, Ken A. Otter, Chan Ryul Park, Christopher M. Perrins, Jan Pinowski, Jiri Porkert, Jaime Potti, Vladimir Remes, Heinz Richner, Seppo Rytkönen, Ming Tang Shiao, Bengt Silverin, Tore Slagsvold, Henrik G. Smith, Alberto Sorace, Martyn J. Stenning, Ian Stewart, Charles F. Thompson, Piotr Tryjanowski, Janos Török, Arie J.Van Noordwijk, David W. Winkler, Nadia Ziane
  • CNRS
  • University of Antwerp
  • Franklin and Marshall College, Lancaster
  • Institute of Biology KarRC RAS
  • University of Valencia
  • University of Lodz
  • INRAE
  • Forest Technology Centre of Catalonia
  • Cornell University
  • University of Northern British Columbia
  • Building C
  • University of Turku
  • Université de Bourgogne
  • Estacion Biologica Doñana (CSIC)
  • University of Gloucestershire
  • University of Oxford
  • Macquarie University
  • Uppsala University
  • Owson University
  • Museum and Institute of Zoology of the Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
  • Lancaster University
  • University of Tartu
  • University of Palermo
  • Center for Advanced Study
  • Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC)
  • Swiss Ornithological Institute
  • Lund University
  • University of Coimbra
  • University of Oulu
  • Korea Forest Research Institute, Seoul
  • Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Palacký University Olomouc
  • University of Bern
  • National Taiwan University
  • University of Gothenburg
  • University of Oslo
  • SROPU
  • University of Sussex
  • University of Kentucky
  • Illinois State University
  • Eotvos Lorand University
  • Poznań University of Life Sciences
  • Royal Netherlands Academy of Arts and Sciences
  • Cornell University Museum of Vertebrates
  • Badji Mokhtar University

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review article › peer-review

326 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The widespread use of artificial nestboxes has led to significant advances in our knowledge of the ecology, behaviour and physiology of cavity nesting birds, especially small passerines. Nestboxes have made it easier to perform routine monitoring and experimental manipulation of eggs or nestlings, and also repeatedly to capture, identify and manipulate the parents. However, when comparing results across study sites the use of nestboxes may also introduce a potentially significant confounding variable in the form of differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in which they are constructed and maintained. However, the use of nestboxes may also introduce an unconsidered and potentially significant confounding variable due to differences in nestbox design amongst studies, such as their physical dimensions, placement height, and the way in which they are constructed and maintained. Here we review to what extent the characteristics of artificial nestboxes (e.g. size, shape, construction material, colour) are documented in the 'methods' sections of publications involving hole-nesting passerine birds using natural or excavated cavities or artificial nestboxes for reproduction and roosting. Despite explicit previous recommendations that authors describe in detail the characteristics of the nestboxes used, we found that the description of nestbox characteristics in most recent publications remains poor and insufficient. We therefore list the types of descriptive data that should be included in the methods sections of relevant manuscripts and justify this by discussing how variation in nestbox characteristics can affect or confound conclusions from nestbox studies. We also propose several recommendations to improve the reliability and usefulness of research based on long-term studies of any secondary hole-nesting species using artificial nestboxes for breeding or roosting.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-26
JournalActa Ornithologica
Volume45
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2010

OECD Field of Science

  • 1.6 Biological Sciences

Keywords

  • Cyanistes
  • Ficedula
  • field experiments
  • flycatcher
  • methods
  • nest sites
  • nestboxes
  • Parus
  • passerines
  • secondary cavity-nesting birds
  • tit

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The design of artificial nestboxes for the study of secondary hole-nesting birds: A review of methodological inconsistencies and potential biases'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this