Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

The effect of damage and geometrical variability on the tensile strength distribution of flax fibers

  • J. Andersons*
  • , E. Sparniņš
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference paperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Natural fibers of plant origin are finding non-traditional applications as reinforcement of composite materials. The mechanical properties of fibers exhibit considerable scatter, being affected by the natural variability in plant as well as the damage accumulated during processing. For bast fibers, the primary damage mode is kink bands - zones of misaligned cellulose microfibrils extending across the fiber and oriented roughly perpendicularly to its axis. Another feature typical for natural fibers and contributing to the scatter of fiber strength is the variability of diameter along a fiber length and among the fibers. An analytical expression for the distribution of the longitudinal tensile strength of bast fibers has been derived, accounting for the strength variability of intact fibers and the effect of kink bands. Upon determining the relevant parameters from fiber damage and geometry characteristics by means of optical microscopy, the theoretical strength distribution function has been found to agree reasonably well with the test results of elementary flax fibers.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAdvances in Fracture and Damage Mechanics IX, FDM 2010
PublisherTrans Tech Publications Ltd
Pages137-140
Number of pages4
Volume452
ISBN (Print)9780878492411
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011

Publication series

NameKey Engineering Materials
Volume452-453
ISSN (Print)1013-9826
ISSN (Electronic)1662-9795

Keywords

  • Flax fibers
  • Kink bands
  • Tensile strength
  • Weibull distribution

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The effect of damage and geometrical variability on the tensile strength distribution of flax fibers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this