Abstract
We use Lithuanian, Latvian and Estonian LFS data (2002-2007) complemented with several
other surveys to compare the profile of Baltic temporary workers abroad before and after EU
accession with that of stayers and return migrants. Determinants of migration and return, as
well as selection issues are discussed. Post-enlargement migrants from all three countries
were significantly less educated than stayers. After accession, medium-educated workers
were most likely to move, other things equal, and human capital became increasingly less
pro-migration over time. Return migrants differ from all movers in many ways and, in
particular, are more educated. Although brain drain was not a feature of post-accession Baltic
migration, brain waste was: during 2006-2007, the proportion of overqualified among higheducated movers ranged from five out of ten for Latvia to seven out of ten for Lithuania, but it
was around one fifth among high-educated stayers in all three countries. We find that the free
movement of labor partially introduced in 2004 (and expanded in 2006) for EU citizens,
although excluding Baltic non-citizens, brought about significant changes in how ethnicity and
citizenship affect workers’ mobility. We conclude by discussing migration perspectives in the
context of recession
other surveys to compare the profile of Baltic temporary workers abroad before and after EU
accession with that of stayers and return migrants. Determinants of migration and return, as
well as selection issues are discussed. Post-enlargement migrants from all three countries
were significantly less educated than stayers. After accession, medium-educated workers
were most likely to move, other things equal, and human capital became increasingly less
pro-migration over time. Return migrants differ from all movers in many ways and, in
particular, are more educated. Although brain drain was not a feature of post-accession Baltic
migration, brain waste was: during 2006-2007, the proportion of overqualified among higheducated movers ranged from five out of ten for Latvia to seven out of ten for Lithuania, but it
was around one fifth among high-educated stayers in all three countries. We find that the free
movement of labor partially introduced in 2004 (and expanded in 2006) for EU citizens,
although excluding Baltic non-citizens, brought about significant changes in how ethnicity and
citizenship affect workers’ mobility. We conclude by discussing migration perspectives in the
context of recession
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Place of Publication | Bonn |
| Publisher | IZA Institute of Labor Economics |
| Number of pages | 49 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Publication series
| Name | Discussion Paper |
|---|---|
| Publisher | Forschungsinstitut zur Zukunft der Arbeit (IZA) |
| No. | July |
| Volume | 5878 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
OECD Field of Science
- 5.2 Economics and Business
Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver