Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Agroecological and technological practices in European arable farming: Past uptake and expert visions for future development

  • Yafei Li*
  • , Julian Helfenstein
  • , Rebecca Swart
  • , Christian Levers
  • , Franziska Mohr
  • , Vasco Diogo
  • , Matthias Bürgi
  • , Tim G. Williams
  • , Rigas Zafeiriou
  • , Anita Zarina
  • , Jeanine Ammann
  • , Víctor Rolo
  • , Peter H. Verburg
  • , Michael Beckmann
  • , Józef Hernik
  • , Thanasis Kizos
  • , Felix Herzog
  • *Šī darba korespondējošais autors
  • Agroscope
  • Wageningen University & Research
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Johann Heinrich von Thunen Institute
  • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
  • University of Bern
  • Mediterranean Institute for Nature and Anthropos (MedINA)
  • University of Extremadura
  • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
  • Brandenburg University of Technology
  • University of Agriculture in Krakow
  • University of the Aegean

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālamZinātniskais raksts (žurnālā)koleģiāli recenzēts

6 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

Agroecological and technological innovations are two important approaches in the transition towards agricultural sustainability. We lack knowledge about how current agricultural contexts may influence future development pathways and the relative importance of the two approaches. This study explores the alignment between past uptake of agroecological and technological practices and future visions of agricultural development in seven European arable farming systems. By combining landscape mapping with farmer interviews, we first assessed the past adoption of agroecological and technological practices in each region. Then, we compared our findings with expert surveys about the future directions of agricultural development that can address local arable farming challenges. We found that in regions with intensive arable farming, agroecological approaches lagged behind the uptake of technological measures, both in the past and in future prospects. In low-intensity regions, we found large gaps between past uptake and future prospects of agroecological and technological practice adoption. These gaps need to be overcome in the context of future challenges of climate change adaptation and of environmental obligations. Our results indicate the need to take differentiated measures depending on farm management intensity and landscape conditions to enhance the future uptake of agroecological and technological solutions that can address the local challenges.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Raksta numurs107553
ŽurnālsLand Use Policy
Sējums153
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - jūn. 2025

ANO IAM

Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

  1. 2 IAM — Bada Izskaušana
    2 IAM — Bada Izskaušana
  2. 8. IAM — Pienācīgas Kvalitātes Nodarbinātība un Ekonomikas Izaugsme
    8. IAM — Pienācīgas Kvalitātes Nodarbinātība un Ekonomikas Izaugsme
  3. 12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana
    12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana
  4. 13. IAM — Klimatrīcība
    13. IAM — Klimatrīcība

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Agroecological and technological practices in European arable farming: Past uptake and expert visions for future development”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo