Kopsavilkums
This article deals with the autobiographies of former Soviet officials that have been published in Latvia since the 1990s. In particular, it focuses on three interrelated layers of biographical narrative: construction of social identity, strategies for avoiding the stigmatization of collaboration, and comparisons between the Soviet and post-Soviet experience. The article contends that former officials in their memoirs use a pragmatic representation of the Soviet past as the major locus of their positive identity. Through this genuine representation of the past, autobiographers emphasize virtues that might be accepted by a post-Soviet neoliberal society.
| Oriģinālvaloda | Angļu |
|---|---|
| Lapas (no-līdz) | 537-555 |
| Lapu skaits | 19 |
| Žurnāls | Journal of Baltic Studies |
| Sējums | 47 |
| Izdevuma numurs | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikācijas statuss | Publicēts - 1 okt. 2016 |
Nospiedums
Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Between improvisation and inevitability: former Latvian officials’ memoirs of the Soviet era”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.Citēt šo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver