Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Divergent agricultural development pathways across farm and landscape scales in Europe: Implications for sustainability and farmer satisfaction

  • Julian Helfenstein*
  • , Samuel Hepner
  • , Amelie Kreuzer
  • , Gregor Achermann
  • , Tim Williams
  • , Matthias Bürgi
  • , Niels Debonne
  • , Thymios Dimopoulos
  • , Vasco Diogo
  • , Wendy Fjellstad
  • , Maria Garcia-Martin
  • , Józef Hernik
  • , Thanasis Kizos
  • , Angela Lausch
  • , Christian Levers
  • , Jaan Liira
  • , Franziska Mohr
  • , Gerardo Moreno
  • , Robert Pazur
  • , Tomasz Salata
  • Beatrice Schüpbach, Rebecca Swart, Peter H. Verburg, Anita Zarina, Felix Herzog
*Šī darba korespondējošais autors
    • Agroscope
    • Wageningen University & Research
    • University of Bern
    • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
    • Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
    • Mediterranean Institute for Nature and Anthropos (MedINA)
    • Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research
    • University of Agriculture in Krakow
    • University of the Aegean
    • Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research
    • Humboldt University of Berlin
    • University of Tartu
    • University of Extremadura
    • Slovak Academy of Sciences

    Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālamZinātniskais raksts (žurnālā)koleģiāli recenzēts

    18 Atsauces (Scopus)

    Kopsavilkums

    Current agricultural practices in Europe are increasingly aggravating societal and environmental safety concerns. This creates social and regulatory pressures on farmers, which can lead to declining material and social status of farmers, farmer discontent, and anti-regulation protests. These tensions are rooted in conflicting value systems for agricultural development, which can range from productivist pathways (i.e. valuing production above all else) to increasing multifunctionality pathways (i.e. valuing agriculture for its contribution to multiple economic, environmental and societal needs). It is largely unknown to what degree individual farms and agricultural landscapes are transitioning towards increasing productivism or multifunctionality in practice. Here, we mapped landscape changes and interviewed farmers (n = 274) to examine the diversity of agricultural development pathways in 17 study sites across Europe over the last 20 years (2000–2020). We also assessed the associations between the development pathways and farmers’ perceptions of socio-economic outcomes, namely job satisfaction, societal valuation, and economic performance. Farm-level development was largely aligned with productivist pathways, while landscape-level changes aligned more closely with an increasing multifunctionality pathway. Farmers on pathways of increasing multifunctionality did not perceive improved outcomes on livelihood indicators as compared to productivist farmers. Furthermore, farms on increasing multifunctionality pathways were concentrated in sites with very high management intensities that face strong pressure from environmental regulations, as well as low-intensity, mountainous sites, where opportunities for intensification are limited. These results suggest that current pathways that increase multifunctionality arise mostly by necessity. Successful agricultural transformation will therefore require policy to create enabling environments that provide socioeconomic benefits for farmers to increase multifunctionality, and a civil society and market conditions that value sustainable agriculture.

    OriģinālvalodaAngļu
    Raksta numurs102855
    ŽurnālsGlobal Environmental Change
    Sējums86
    DOIs
    Publikācijas statussPublicēts - maijs 2024

    ANO IAM

    Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

    1. 2 IAM — Bada Izskaušana
      2 IAM — Bada Izskaušana
    2. 8. IAM — Pienācīgas Kvalitātes Nodarbinātība un Ekonomikas Izaugsme
      8. IAM — Pienācīgas Kvalitātes Nodarbinātība un Ekonomikas Izaugsme
    3. 12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana
      12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana
    4. 17. IAM — Partnerības Mērķu Sasniegšanai
      17. IAM — Partnerības Mērķu Sasniegšanai

    Nospiedums

    Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Divergent agricultural development pathways across farm and landscape scales in Europe: Implications for sustainability and farmer satisfaction”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

    Citēt šo