TY - GEN
T1 - Do we really know how to measure software quality?
AU - Arnicāne, Vineta
AU - Borzovs, Juris
AU - Nesaule-Erina, Anete
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
Copyright © 2020 The Authors.
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Particular return to McCall's et al. seminal work has been done in recent international standards ISO/IEC 25022:2016 and ISO/IEC 25023:2016. 122 lower level measures (metrics in McCall's et al. terminology) were introduced. Authors of standards themselves classify quality measures as Highly Recommended, Recommended, Used at user's Discretion and Generic, Specific. In this paper, quality measures are additionally classified also from the point of view of objectivity of measurement and of usage in industry.
AB - Particular return to McCall's et al. seminal work has been done in recent international standards ISO/IEC 25022:2016 and ISO/IEC 25023:2016. 122 lower level measures (metrics in McCall's et al. terminology) were introduced. Authors of standards themselves classify quality measures as Highly Recommended, Recommended, Used at user's Discretion and Generic, Specific. In this paper, quality measures are additionally classified also from the point of view of objectivity of measurement and of usage in industry.
KW - Quality characteristics
KW - Quality measures
KW - Quality metrics
KW - Software engineering
KW - Software quality models
UR - http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2620/paper2.pdf
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85089546019
M3 - Conference paper
VL - 2620
T3 - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
SP - 9
EP - 16
BT - CEUR Workshop Proceedings
PB - CEUR
CY - Aachen
ER -