Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Doctrine of State Continuity. Latvia’s Experience

  • Court of Justice of the European Union former President of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Latvia former Judge and President of Section of the European Court of Human Rights
  • University of Latvia

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālamZinātniskais raksts (žurnālā)koleģiāli recenzēts

Kopsavilkums

The article examines the scope and consequences the continuity of the Republic of Latvia in several domains and places them within a broader context of Latvia’s history. Firstly, it describes and analyses some functions of the State of Latvia which continued to be performed during the years of occupation by the USSR and Nazi Germany (1940–1990) and, secondly, the significance of the de iure effect of the Satversme of the Republic of Latvia of 15 February 1922 during the years of occupation and following the restoration of the independence of the state. The authors advance the thesis that the occupation regimes of the communist USSR and Nazi Germany failed to extinguish the existence of the Republic of Latvia as an internationally recognised subject of international law, moreover, Latvia in practice did not discontinue performing some functions of the state. Of course, full restoration of the independence of the state on the basis of values enshrined in the Satversme occurred only after coup d’état in the Soviet Union.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Lapas (no-līdz)91-110
Lapu skaits20
ŽurnālsLaw: Journal of the University of Latvia
Sējums2021
Izdevuma numurs14
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - 2021

OECD Zinātnes nozare

  • 5.5 Tiesību zinātne

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Doctrine of State Continuity. Latvia’s Experience”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo