Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies

  • Davide Geneletti
  • , Blal Adem Esmail*
  • , Chiara Cortinovis
  • , Ildikó Arany
  • , Mario Balzan
  • , Pieter van Beukering
  • , Sabine Bicking
  • , Paulo A.V. Borges
  • , Bilyana Borisova
  • , Steven Broekx
  • , Benjamin Burkhard
  • , Artur Gil
  • , Ola Inghe
  • , Leena Kopperoinen
  • , Marion Kruse
  • , Inge Liekens
  • , Damian Lowicki
  • , Andrzej Mizgajski
  • , Sara Mulder
  • , Stoyan Nedkov
  • Hannah Ostergard, Ana Picanço, Anda Ruskule, Fernando Santos-Martín, Ina M. Sieber, Johan Svensson, Dava Vačkářů, Kristina Veidemane
*Šī darba korespondējošais autors
  • University of Trento
  • Centre for Ecological Research
  • Malta College of Arts, Science & Technology
  • Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
  • Kiel University
  • Leibniz University Hannover
  • cE3c – Centre for Ecology
  • University of the Azores
  • Sofia University St. Kliment Ohridski
  • Flemish Institute for Technological Research
  • Leibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research
  • CE3C—Centre for Ecology
  • Swedish Environmental Protection Agency
  • Finnish Environment Institute
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt
  • Norwegian Institute for Nature Research
  • Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań
  • FSD
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • Baltic Environmental Forum
  • Universidad Rey Juan Carlos
  • Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  • CZECHGLOBE Global Change Research Institute
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • Baltic Environmental Forum-Latvia BEF-LV

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

55 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

This paper analyses and compares a set of case studies on ecosystem services (ES) mapping and assessment with the purpose of formulating lessons learned and recommendations. Fourteen case studies were selected during the EU Horizon 2020 “Coordination and Support Action” ESMERALDA to represent different policy-and decision-making processes throughout the European Union, across a wide range of themes, biomes and scales. The analysis is based on a framework that addresses the key steps of an ES mapping and assessment process, namely policy questions, stakeholder identification and involvement, application of mapping and assessment methods, dissemination and communication and implementation. The analysis revealed that most case studies were policy-orientated or gave explicit suggestions for policy implementation in different contexts, including urban, rural and natural areas. Amongst the findings, the importance of starting stakeholder engagement early in the process was confirmed in order to generate interest and confidence in the project and to increase their willingness to cooperate. Concerning mapping and assessment methods, it was found that the integration of methods and results is essential for providing a comprehensive overview from different perspectives (e.g. social, economic). Finally, lessons learned for effective implementation of ES mapping and assessment results are presented and discussed.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Raksta numurse53111
Lapas (no-līdz)1-31
Lapu skaits31
ŽurnālsOne Ecosystem
Sējums5
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - 2020

ANO IAM

Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

  1. 12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana
    12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana
  2. 16. IAM — Miers, Taisnīgums un Spēcīgas Iestādes
    16. IAM — Miers, Taisnīgums un Spēcīgas Iestādes

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Ecosystem services mapping and assessment for policy-and decision-making: Lessons learned from a comparative analysis of european case studies”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo