Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Editor's Choice – Occurrence and Classification of Proximal Type I Endoleaks After EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the NellixTM Device

  • on behalf of the
  • , EVAS Type IA Endoleak Study Group
  • Department of Surgery
  • Rijnstate Hospital
  • Department of Radiology
  • Auckland District Health Board
  • Paula Stradina Clinical University Hospital
  • Department of Radiology
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
  • Syntactx
  • Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Department of Interventional Radiology
  • Department of Vascular Surgery
  • ETZ Elisabeth
  • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Department of Vascular Surgery
  • St. Antonius Ziekenhuis
  • Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Klinikum Augsburg
  • Department of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery
  • Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz
  • Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Marienhospital Kevelaer
  • Department of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
  • Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf
  • Department of Radiology
  • SIHF
  • Department of Vascular Surgery
  • Ospedale Mauriziano Umberto I
  • St George’s Hospital

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

47 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

Objective/Background Proximal type I endoleaks are associated with abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth and rupture and necessitate repair. The Nellix™ EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing (EVAS) system is a unique approach to AAA repair, where the appearance and treatment of endoleaks is also different. This study aimed to analyse and categorise proximal endoleaks in an EVAS treated cohort. Methods All patients, treated from February 2013 to December 2015, in 15 experienced EVAS centres, presenting with proximal endoleak were included. Computed tomography scans were analysed by a core laboratory. A consensus meeting was organised to discuss and qualify each case for selection, technical aspects, and possible causes of the endoleak. Endoleaks were classified using a novel classification system for EVAS. Results During the study period 1851 patients were treated using EVAS at 15 centres and followed for a median of 494 ± 283 days. Among these, 58 cases (3.1%) developed a proximal endoleak (1.5% early and 1.7% late); of these, 84% of 58 patients were treated outside the original and 96% outside the current, refined, instructions for use. Low stent positioning was the most likely cause in 44.6%, a hostile anatomy in 16.1%, and a combination of both in 33.9%. Treatment, by embolisation or proximal extension, was performed in 47% of cases, with a technical success of 97%. Conclusion The overall incidence of proximal endoleak after EVAS is 3.1% after a mean follow-up period of 16 months, with 1.5% occurring within 30 days. Their occurrence is related to patient selection and stent positioning. Early detection and classification is crucial to avoid the potential of sac rupture.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Lapas (no-līdz)729-736
Lapu skaits8
ŽurnālsEuropean Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
Sējums54
Izdevuma numurs6
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - dec. 2017
Ārēji publicētsJā

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Editor's Choice – Occurrence and Classification of Proximal Type I Endoleaks After EndoVascular Aneurysm Sealing Using the NellixTM Device”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo