TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of technique on bifurcation stent outcomes in the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Coronary Trial
AU - Arunothayaraj, Sandeep
AU - Lassen, Jens Flensted
AU - Clesham, Gerald J.
AU - Spence, Mark S.
AU - Koning, René
AU - Banning, Adrian P.
AU - Lindsay, Mitchell
AU - Christiansen, Evald H.
AU - Egred, Mohaned
AU - Cockburn, James
AU - Mylotte, Darren
AU - Brunel, Philippe
AU - Ferenc, Miroslaw
AU - Hovasse, Thomas
AU - Wlodarczak, Adrian
AU - Pan, Manuel
AU - Silvestri, Marc
AU - Ērglis, Andrejs
AU - Kretov, Evgeny
AU - Chieffo, Alaide
AU - Lefèvre, Thierry
AU - Burzotta, Francesco
AU - Darremont, Olivier
AU - Stankovic, Goran
AU - Morice, Marie Claude
AU - Louvard, Yves
AU - Hildick-Smith, David
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
PY - 2023/2/15
Y1 - 2023/2/15
N2 - Background: Techniques for provisional and dual-stent left main bifurcation stenting require optimization. Aim: To identify technical variables influencing procedural outcomes and periprocedural myocardial infarction following left main bifurcation intervention. Methods: Procedural and outcome data were analyzed in 438 patients from the per-protocol cohort of the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Trial (EBC MAIN). These patients were randomized to the provisional strategy or a compatible dual-stent extension (T, T-and-protrude, or culotte). Results: Mean age was 71 years and 37.4% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Transient reduction of side vessel thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow occurred after initial stent placement in 5% of procedures but was not associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction. Failure to rewire a jailed vessel during any strategy was more common when jailed wires were not used (9.5% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [OR]: 6.4, p = 0.002). In the provisional cohort, the use of the proximal optimization technique was associated with less subsequent side vessel intervention (23.3% vs. 41.9%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.048). Side vessel stenting was predominantly required for dissection, which occurred more often following side vessel preparation (15.3% vs. 4.4%, OR: 3.1, p = 0.040). Exclusive use of noncompliant balloons for kissing balloon inflation was associated with reduced need for side vessel intervention in provisional cases (20.5% vs. 38.5%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.013), and a reduced risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction across all strategies (2.9% vs. 7.7%, OR: 0.2, p = 0.020). Conclusion: When performing provisional or compatible dual-stent left main bifurcation intervention, jailed wire use is associated with successful jailed vessel rewiring. Side vessel preparation in provisional patients is linked to increased side vessel dissection requiring stenting. Use of the proximal optimization technique may reduce the need for additional side vessel intervention, and noncompliant balloon use for kissing balloon inflation is associated with a reduction in both side vessel stenting and periprocedural myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02497014.
AB - Background: Techniques for provisional and dual-stent left main bifurcation stenting require optimization. Aim: To identify technical variables influencing procedural outcomes and periprocedural myocardial infarction following left main bifurcation intervention. Methods: Procedural and outcome data were analyzed in 438 patients from the per-protocol cohort of the European Bifurcation Club Left Main Trial (EBC MAIN). These patients were randomized to the provisional strategy or a compatible dual-stent extension (T, T-and-protrude, or culotte). Results: Mean age was 71 years and 37.4% presented with an acute coronary syndrome. Transient reduction of side vessel thrombolysis in myocardial infarction flow occurred after initial stent placement in 5% of procedures but was not associated with periprocedural myocardial infarction. Failure to rewire a jailed vessel during any strategy was more common when jailed wires were not used (9.5% vs. 2.5%, odds ratio [OR]: 6.4, p = 0.002). In the provisional cohort, the use of the proximal optimization technique was associated with less subsequent side vessel intervention (23.3% vs. 41.9%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.048). Side vessel stenting was predominantly required for dissection, which occurred more often following side vessel preparation (15.3% vs. 4.4%, OR: 3.1, p = 0.040). Exclusive use of noncompliant balloons for kissing balloon inflation was associated with reduced need for side vessel intervention in provisional cases (20.5% vs. 38.5%, OR: 0.4, p = 0.013), and a reduced risk of periprocedural myocardial infarction across all strategies (2.9% vs. 7.7%, OR: 0.2, p = 0.020). Conclusion: When performing provisional or compatible dual-stent left main bifurcation intervention, jailed wire use is associated with successful jailed vessel rewiring. Side vessel preparation in provisional patients is linked to increased side vessel dissection requiring stenting. Use of the proximal optimization technique may reduce the need for additional side vessel intervention, and noncompliant balloon use for kissing balloon inflation is associated with a reduction in both side vessel stenting and periprocedural myocardial infarction. Clinical Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT02497014.
KW - bifurcation
KW - coronary occlusion
KW - drug-eluting stent
KW - left main
KW - myocardial infarction
UR - https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ccd.30575
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85147367904
U2 - 10.1002/ccd.30575
DO - 10.1002/ccd.30575
M3 - Article
C2 - 36709485
SN - 1522-1946
VL - 101
SP - 553
EP - 562
JO - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
JF - Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
IS - 3
ER -