Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Impact of the pre-examination phase on multicenter metabolomic studies

  • Veronica Ghini
  • , Peter M. Abuja
  • , Ozren Polasek
  • , Lukasz Kozera
  • , Päivi Laiho
  • , Gabriele Anton
  • , Marie Zins
  • , Janis Klovins
  • , Andres Metspalu
  • , H. Erich Wichmann
  • , Christian Gieger
  • , Claudio Luchinat
  • , Kurt Zatloukal*
  • , Paola Turano*
  • *Šī darba korespondējošais autors
  • Consorzio Interuniversitario Risonanze Magnetiche di Metallo Proteine (CIRMMP)
  • University of Florence
  • Medical University of Graz
  • University of Split
  • Gen-info Ltd
  • BBMRI-ERIC
  • University of Helsinki
  • Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health
  • Population-based Epidemiological Cohorts Unit-UMS 11
  • Latvijas Biomedicīnas pētījumu un studiju centrs
  • University of Tartu

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

28 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

The development of metabolomics in clinical applications has been limited by the lack of validation in large multicenter studies. Large population cohorts and their biobanks are a valuable resource for acquiring insights into molecular disease mechanisms. Nevertheless, most of their collections are not tailored for metabolomics and have been created without specific attention to the pre-analytical requirements for high-quality metabolome assessment. Thus, comparing samples obtained by different pre-analytical procedures remains a major challenge. Here, 1H NMR-based analyses are used to demonstrate how human serum and plasma samples collected with different operating procedures within several large European cohort studies from the Biobanking and Biomolecular Resources Infrastructure – Large Prospective Cohorts (BBMRI-LPC) consortium can be easily revealed by supervised multivariate statistical analyses at the initial stages of the process, to avoid biases in the downstream analysis. The inter-biobank differences are discussed in terms of deviations from the validated CEN/TS 16945:2016 / ISO 23118:2021 norms. It clearly emerges that biobanks must adhere to the evidence-based guidelines in order to support wider-scale application of metabolomics in biomedicine, and that NMR spectroscopy is informative in comparing the quality of different sample sources in multi cohort/center studies.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Lapas (no-līdz)37-47
Lapu skaits11
ŽurnālsNew Biotechnology
Sējums68
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - 25 maijs 2022
Ārēji publicētsJā

ANO IAM

Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

  1. 7. IAM — Tīra Enerģija par Pieejamu Cenu
    7. IAM — Tīra Enerģija par Pieejamu Cenu
  2. 9. IAM — Rūpniecība, Inovācija un Infrastruktūra
    9. IAM — Rūpniecība, Inovācija un Infrastruktūra
  3. 12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana
    12. IAM — Atbildīgs Patēriņš un Ražošana

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Impact of the pre-examination phase on multicenter metabolomic studies”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo