Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Incidence of diabetes following ramipril or rosiglitazone withdrawal

  • Rury R. Holman*
  • , Bernie Zinman
  • , Salim Yusuf
  • , Patrick M. Sheridan
  • , Sonia S. Anand
  • , Jackie J. Bosch
  • , Ignacio Conget
  • , Melanie J. Davies
  • , Valdis Pirags
  • , Gilles R. Dagenais
  • , Janice M. Pogue
  • , Paul Z. Zimmet
  • , Hertzel C. Gerstein
  • *Šī darba korespondējošais autors
  • University of Oxford
  • University of Toronto
  • McMaster University
  • Hospital Clínic de Barcelona
  • University of Leicester
  • Université Laval
  • Hamilton Health Sciences
  • Baker Heart and Diabetes Institute

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

32 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

OBJECTIVE - To examine the impact of withdrawing rosiglitazone and ramipril medication on diabetes incidence after closeout of the Diabetes REduction Assessment with ramipril and rosiglitazone Medication (DREAM) trial. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS - The 3,366 DREAM subjects at trial end who had not developed diabetes while taking double-blind study medication were transferred to single-blind placebo for 2 to 3months before undergoing an oral glucose tolerance test. Glycemic status was analyzed for the trial plus washout period and for the washout period alone. RESULTS - Following median (interquartile range) 71 (63-86) days drug withdrawal, overall glycemic status remained modestly improved in those allocated ramipril during the trial with an 11% increase in regression to normoglycemia, compared with placebo. In those previously allocated rosiglitazone, glycemic status remained substantially improved with a 49% reduction of new-onset diabetes or death and a 22% increase in regression to normoglycemia, compared with placebo. However, during the washout phase alone the incidence of diabetes or death was identical for those allocated previously to ramipril or placebo, or to rosiglitazone or placebo. CONCLUSIONS - In people allocated to ramipril comparedwith those not allocated ramipril during the trial, the postwashout normoglycemia incidence was higher. In people allocated to rosiglitazone compared with those not allocated rosiglitazone during the trial, the postwashout incidence of diabetes was significantly lower and the incidence of normoglycemia was higher. During the washout period, diabetes incidence was the same for ramipril versus placebo and for rosiglitazone versus placebo. Rosiglitazone delays disease progression during treatment but the process resumes at the placebo rate when the drug is stopped.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Lapas (no-līdz)1265-1269
Lapu skaits5
ŽurnālsDiabetes Care
Sējums34
Izdevuma numurs6
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - jūn. 2011

ANO IAM

Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

  1. 3. IAM — Laba Veselība un Labbūtība
    3. IAM — Laba Veselība un Labbūtība

OECD Zinātnes nozare

  • 3. Medicīnas un veselības zinātnes

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Incidence of diabetes following ramipril or rosiglitazone withdrawal”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo