Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries

  • Members of the International Situations Project
  • University of Houston
  • University of California at Riverside
  • Universidad de Buenos Aires
  • University of Melbourne
  • University of Graz
  • Universidad Católica Bolviana
  • Universidade Federal da Paraíba
  • Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás
  • Bulgarian Academy of Sciences
  • University of British Columbia
  • Université du Québec à Montréal
  • Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
  • Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
  • Universidad de la Frontera
  • Durham University
  • ShanghaiTech University
  • Fundación Universitaria del Area Andina
  • Universidad Antonio Nariño
  • University of Crete
  • Technological Institute of Crete
  • Hellenic American University
  • University of Zagreb
  • Czech Academy of Sciences
  • University of Copenhagen
  • University of Warwick
  • Université de Toulouse
  • Université de Rennes
  • Al-Azhar University of Gaza
  • Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University
  • Humboldt University of Berlin
  • University of Göttingen
  • Bielefeld University
  • The Education University of Hong Kong
  • Lingnan University
  • Budapest University of Technology and Economics
  • Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church Budapest
  • AMRI Institute of Neurosciences
  • Jnana Prabodihini's Institute of Psychology
  • Univeritas Ahmad Dahlan
  • Indonesia University of Education

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

44 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

Objective: The current exploratory study sought to examine dispositional optimism, or the general expectation for positive outcomes, around the world. Method: Dispositional optimism and possible correlates were assessed across 61 countries (N = 15,185; mean age = 21.92; 77% female). Mean-level differences in optimism were computed along with their relationships with individual and country-level variables. Results: Worldwide, mean optimism levels were above the midpoint of the scale. Perhaps surprisingly, country-level optimism was negatively related to gross domestic product per capita, population density, and democratic norms and positively related to income inequality and perceived corruption. However, country-level optimism was positively related to projected economic improvement. Individual-level optimism was positively related to individual well-being within every country, although this relationship was less strong in countries with challenging economic and social circumstances. Conclusions: While individuals around the world are generally optimistic, societal characteristics appear to affect the degree to which their optimism is associated with psychological well-being, sometimes in seemingly anomalous ways.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Lapas (no-līdz)288-304
Lapu skaits17
ŽurnālsJournal of Personality
Sējums89
Izdevuma numurs2
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - apr. 2021

ANO IAM

Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

  1. 1. IAM — Nabadzības Izskaušana
    1. IAM — Nabadzības Izskaušana
  2. 10. IAM — Nevienlīdzības Mazināšana
    10. IAM — Nevienlīdzības Mazināšana
  3. 16. IAM — Miers, Taisnīgums un Spēcīgas Iestādes
    16. IAM — Miers, Taisnīgums un Spēcīgas Iestādes

OECD Zinātnes nozare

  • 5.1 Psiholoģija

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “International optimism: Correlates and consequences of dispositional optimism across 61 countries”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo