Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Investigating the Physics of Tokamak Global Stability with Interpretable Machine Learning Tools

  • Līga Avotiņa (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Larisa Baumane (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Dāvis Čonka (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Mihails Haļitovs (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Ieva Igaune (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Juris Jansons (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Gunta Ķizāne (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Ričards Kovaldins (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Andris Leščinskis (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Broņislavs Leščinskis (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Elīna Pajuste (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Aigars Vītiņš (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Artūrs Zariņš (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Roberts Zariņš (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Murari Andrea
  • , JET Contributors

    Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālamZinātniskais raksts (žurnālā)koleģiāli recenzēts

    20 Atsauces (Scopus)

    Kopsavilkums

    The inadequacies of basic physics models for disruption prediction have induced the community to increasingly rely on data mining tools. In the last decade, it has been shown how machine learning predictors can achieve a much better performance than those obtained with manually identified thresholds or empirical descriptions of the plasma stability limits. The main criticisms of these techniques focus therefore on two different but interrelated issues: poor "physics fidelity" and limited interpretability. Insufficient "physics fidelity" refers to the fact that the mathematical models of most data mining tools do not reflect the physics of the underlying phenomena. Moreover, they implement a black box approach to learning, which results in very poor interpretability of their outputs. To overcome or at least mitigate these limitations, a general methodology has been devised and tested, with the objective of combining the predictive capability of machine learning tools with the expression of the operational boundary in terms of traditional equations more suited to understanding the underlying physics. The proposed approach relies on the application of machine learning classifiers (such as Support Vector Machines or Classification Trees) and Symbolic Regression via Genetic Programming directly to experimental databases. The results are very encouraging. The obtained equations of the boundary between the safe and disruptive regions of the operational space present almost the same performance as the machine learning classifiers, based on completely independent learning techniques. Moreover, these models possess significantly better predictive power than traditional representations, such as the Hugill or the beta limit. More importantly, they are realistic and intuitive mathematical formulas, which are well suited to supporting theoretical understanding and to benchmarking empirical models. They can also be deployed easily and efficiently in real-time feedback systems.

    OriģinālvalodaAngļu
    Raksta numurs6683
    ŽurnālsApplied Sciences (Switzerland)
    Sējums10
    Izdevuma numurs19
    DOIs
    Publikācijas statussPublicēts - 1 okt. 2020

    OECD Zinātnes nozare

    • 1.3 Fizika un astronomija

    Nospiedums

    Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Investigating the Physics of Tokamak Global Stability with Interpretable Machine Learning Tools”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

    Citēt šo