Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Preoperative Multiparametric Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology evaluation of parotid gland tumors: which is the best technique?

  • Olga Guiban*
  • , Antonello Rubini
  • , Daniele Fresilli
  • , Giuseppe Tiziano Lucarelli
  • , Massimo Ralli
  • , Andrea Cassoni
  • , Mario Bezzi
  • , Maija Radziņa
  • , Antonio Greco
  • , Marco De Vincentiis
  • , Corrado De Vito
  • , Flaminia De Cristofaro
  • , Carlo Catalano
  • , Vito Cantisani
  • *Šī darba korespondējošais autors
    • University of Rome La Sapienza
    • ASL Rome 5
    • Riga Stradins University

    Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālamZinātniskais raksts (žurnālā)koleģiāli recenzēts

    12 Atsauces (Scopus)

    Kopsavilkums

    Aims: To evaluate the pre-surgical diagnostic value of Multiparametric Ultrasound (MPUS) and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology (FNAC) in differentiating parotid gland tumors, comparing the results with histology. Materials and methods: The study enrolled 84 patients with parotid gland lesions surgically treated in a single tertiary center and evaluated by MPUS. Each patient underwent FNAC. Histological examination was considered the gold standard. Results: Histology identified 62 benign tumors and 22 malignancies. In the differential diagnosis between malignant and benign lesions, B-mode Ultrasound (US), Color-Doppler US, Contrast-Enhanced US (CEUS), Elastography (USE) and FNAC showed the following values of sensitivity: 82%, 81%, 86%, 77%, 73% respectively; specificity: 97%, 61%, 95%, 71%, 97% respectively; PPV: 90%, 43%, 86%, 50%, 89% respectively; NPV: 93%, 90%, 95%, 88%, 91% respectively; and accuracy: 89%, 71%, 90%, 78%, 84% respectively. Conclusions: CEUS proved to be a valid and accurate method for identifying malignant tumors of parotid gland; the combination of B-mode US with CEUS showed similar diagnostic accuracy, but better sensitivity than CEUS taken alone. USE did not improve the diagnostic performance of the B-mode US, alone or in association with CEUS; however, it revealed the highest diagnostic accuracy in the differentiation between benign lesions. FNAC demonstrated lower values in comparison with CEUS and with USE. Therefore, according to our study, MPUS could be proposed as a valid alternative to FNAC.

    OriģinālvalodaAngļu
    Lapas (no-līdz)402-409
    Lapu skaits8
    ŽurnālsMedical Ultrasonography
    Sējums23
    Izdevuma numurs4
    DOIs
    Publikācijas statussPublicēts - 2021

    OECD Zinātnes nozare

    • 3. Medicīnas un veselības zinātnes

    Nospiedums

    Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Preoperative Multiparametric Ultrasound and Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology evaluation of parotid gland tumors: which is the best technique?”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

    Citēt šo