Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: An expert panel Delphi consensus project

Hassan M. Ahmed; Benjamin P. Atterton; Gillian G. Crowe; Jaime L. Barratta; Mark Johnson; Eugene Viscusi; Sanjib Adhikary; Eric Albrecht; Karen Boretsky; Jan Boublik; Dara S. Breslin; Kelly Byrne; Alan Chŉg; Alwin Chuan; Patrick Conroy; Craig Daniel; Andrzej Daszkiewicz; Alain Delbos; Dan Sebastian Dirzu; Dmytro Dmytriiev; Paul Fennessy; H. Barrie J. Fischer; Henry Frizelle; Jeff Gadsden; Philippe Gautier; Rajnish K. Gupta; Yavuz Gürkan; Harold David Hardman; William Harrop-Griffiths; Peter Hebbard; Nadia Hernandez; Jakub Hlasny; Gabriella Iohom; Vivian H.Y. Ip; Christina L. Jeng; Rebecca L. Johnson; Hari Kalagara; Brian Kinirons; Andrew Kenneth Lansdown; Jody C. Leng; Yean Chin Lim; Clara Lobo; Danielle B. Ludwin; Alan James Robert Macfarlane; Anthony T. Machi; Padraig Mahon; Stephen Mannion; David H. McLeod; Peter Merjavy; Aleksejs Miscuks; Christopher H. Mitchell; Eleni Moka; Peter Moran; Ann Ngui; Olga C. Nin; Brian D. O’Donnell; Amit Pawa; Anahi Perlas; Steven Porter; John Paul Pozek; Humberto C. Rebelo; Vicente Roqués; Kristopher M. Schroeder; Gary Schwartz; Eric S. Schwenk; Luc Sermeus; George Shorten; Karthikeyan Srinivasan; Markus F. Stevens; Kassiani Theodoraki; Lloyd R. Turbitt; Luis Fernando Valdés-Vilches; Thomas Volk; Katrina Webster; T. Wiesmann; Sylvia H. Wilson; Morné Wolmarans; Glenn Woodworth; Andrew K. Worek; E. M.Louise Moran

doi:10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136

Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: An expert panel Delphi consensus project

Hassan M. Ahmed
, Benjamin P. Atterton
, Gillian G. Crowe
, Jaime L. Barratta
, Mark Johnson
, Eugene Viscusi
, Sanjib Adhikary
, Eric Albrecht
, Karen Boretsky
, Jan Boublik
, Dara S. Breslin
, Kelly Byrne
, Alan Chŉg
, Alwin Chuan
, Patrick Conroy
, Craig Daniel
, Andrzej Daszkiewicz
, Alain Delbos
, Dan Sebastian Dirzu
, Dmytro Dmytriiev

Paul Fennessy, H. Barrie J. Fischer, Henry Frizelle, Jeff Gadsden, Philippe Gautier, Rajnish K. Gupta, Yavuz Gürkan, Harold David Hardman, William Harrop-Griffiths, Peter Hebbard, Nadia Hernandez, Jakub Hlasny, Gabriella Iohom, Vivian H.Y. Ip, Christina L. Jeng, Rebecca L. Johnson, Hari Kalagara, Brian Kinirons, Andrew Kenneth Lansdown, Jody C. Leng, Yean Chin Lim, Clara Lobo, Danielle B. Ludwin, Alan James Robert Macfarlane, Anthony T. Machi, Padraig Mahon, Stephen Mannion, David H. McLeod, Peter Merjavy, Aleksejs Miscuks, Christopher H. Mitchell, Eleni Moka, Peter Moran, Ann Ngui, Olga C. Nin, Brian D. O’Donnell, Amit Pawa, Anahi Perlas, Steven Porter, John Paul Pozek, Humberto C. Rebelo, Vicente Roqués, Kristopher M. Schroeder, Gary Schwartz, Eric S. Schwenk, Luc Sermeus, George Shorten, Karthikeyan Srinivasan, Markus F. Stevens, Kassiani Theodoraki, Lloyd R. Turbitt, Luis Fernando Valdés-Vilches, Thomas Volk, Katrina Webster, T. Wiesmann, Sylvia H. Wilson, Morné Wolmarans, Glenn Woodworth, Andrew K. Worek, E. M.Louise Moran^*

^*Šī darba korespondējošais autors

Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Letterkenny University Hospital
Thomas Jefferson University
Fiona Stanley Hospital
Pennsylvania State University
University of Lausanne
Boston Children's Hospital
Stanford University
University College Dublin
Waikato Hospital
University of New South Wales
Tallaght Hospital
Gold Coast University Hospital
Medical University of Silesia in Katowice
Clinique Medipole Garonne
Cluj-Napoca County Emergency Hospital
National Pirogov Memorial Medical University, Vinnytsya
Royal Children's Hospital
Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust
Duke University
Clinique Sainte Anne Saint Remi
Vanderbilt University
Koc University
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust
University of Melbourne
Northeast Health Wangaratta
University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston
F. D. Roosevelt Teaching Hospital
University College Cork
University of Alberta
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN
University of Alabama at Birmingham
University of Galway
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital
Department of Veterans Affairs
Changi General Hospital
Hospital das Forças Armadas
Columbia University
NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde
University of Glasgow
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Flinders Medical Centre
Craigavon Area University Teaching Hospital
Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital
Creta Interclinic Hospital
University of Florida
Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust
King's College London
Toronto Western Hospital
University of Toronto
Mayo Clinic Department of Cardiovascular Medicine
University of Kansas Health System
Hospital Luz Arrábida
Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Maimonides Medical Center
Université catholique de Louvain
Insight II SFI Research Centre
Academic Medical Centre University of Amsterdam
National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
Royal Victoria Hospital Belfast
Hospital Costa Del Sol
Saarland University
Royal Hobart Hospital
University of Tasmania
Justus Liebig University Giessen
Diakoneo Diak Klinikum Schwäbisch Hall
Medical University of South Carolina
Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Oregon Health and Science University
Post and Post LLC

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

24 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

Background and objectives Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Results Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.

Oriģinālvaloda	Angļu
Lapas (no-līdz)	301-308
Lapu skaits	8
Žurnāls	Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
Sējums	47
Izdevuma numurs	5
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136
Publikācijas statuss	Publicēts - 2022

Piekļuve Dokumentiem

10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136

Citi faili un saites

Saite uz publikāciju Scopus

Citēt šo

Ahmed, H. M., Atterton, B. P., Crowe, G. G., Barratta, J. L., Johnson, M., Viscusi, E., Adhikary, S., Albrecht, E., Boretsky, K., Boublik, J., Breslin, D. S., Byrne, K., Chŉg, A., Chuan, A., Conroy, P., Daniel, C., Daszkiewicz, A., Delbos, A., Dirzu, D. S., ... Moran, E. M. L. (2022). Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: An expert panel Delphi consensus project. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 47(5), 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136

@article{c830d9dce3fd4608afe87a6832218732,

title = "Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: An expert panel Delphi consensus project",

abstract = "Background and objectives Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75\% agreement and weak consensus as 50\%-74\% agreement. Results Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.",

author = "Ahmed, \{Hassan M.\} and Atterton, \{Benjamin P.\} and Crowe, \{Gillian G.\} and Barratta, \{Jaime L.\} and Mark Johnson and Eugene Viscusi and Sanjib Adhikary and Eric Albrecht and Karen Boretsky and Jan Boublik and Breslin, \{Dara S.\} and Kelly Byrne and Alan Chŉg and Alwin Chuan and Patrick Conroy and Craig Daniel and Andrzej Daszkiewicz and Alain Delbos and Dirzu, \{Dan Sebastian\} and Dmytro Dmytriiev and Paul Fennessy and Fischer, \{H. Barrie J.\} and Henry Frizelle and Jeff Gadsden and Philippe Gautier and Gupta, \{Rajnish K.\} and Yavuz G{\"u}rkan and Hardman, \{Harold David\} and William Harrop-Griffiths and Peter Hebbard and Nadia Hernandez and Jakub Hlasny and Gabriella Iohom and Ip, \{Vivian H.Y.\} and Jeng, \{Christina L.\} and Johnson, \{Rebecca L.\} and Hari Kalagara and Brian Kinirons and Lansdown, \{Andrew Kenneth\} and Leng, \{Jody C.\} and Lim, \{Yean Chin\} and Clara Lobo and Ludwin, \{Danielle B.\} and Macfarlane, \{Alan James Robert\} and Machi, \{Anthony T.\} and Padraig Mahon and Stephen Mannion and McLeod, \{David H.\} and Peter Merjavy and Aleksejs Miscuks and Mitchell, \{Christopher H.\} and Eleni Moka and Peter Moran and Ann Ngui and Nin, \{Olga C.\} and O{\textquoteright}Donnell, \{Brian D.\} and Amit Pawa and Anahi Perlas and Steven Porter and Pozek, \{John Paul\} and Rebelo, \{Humberto C.\} and Vicente Roqu{\'e}s and Schroeder, \{Kristopher M.\} and Gary Schwartz and Schwenk, \{Eric S.\} and Luc Sermeus and George Shorten and Karthikeyan Srinivasan and Stevens, \{Markus F.\} and Kassiani Theodoraki and Turbitt, \{Lloyd R.\} and Vald{\'e}s-Vilches, \{Luis Fernando\} and Thomas Volk and Katrina Webster and T. Wiesmann and Wilson, \{Sylvia H.\} and Morn{\'e} Wolmarans and Glenn Woodworth and Worek, \{Andrew K.\} and Moran, \{E. M.Louise\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} American Society of Regional Anesthesia \& Pain Medicine 2022.",

year = "2022",

doi = "10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136",

language = "English",

volume = "47",

pages = "301--308",

journal = "Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine",

issn = "1098-7339",

publisher = "BMJ Publishing Group",

number = "5",

}

Ahmed, HM, Atterton, BP, Crowe, GG, Barratta, JL, Johnson, M, Viscusi, E, Adhikary, S, Albrecht, E, Boretsky, K, Boublik, J, Breslin, DS, Byrne, K, Chŉg, A, Chuan, A, Conroy, P, Daniel, C, Daszkiewicz, A, Delbos, A, Dirzu, DS, Dmytriiev, D, Fennessy, P, Fischer, HBJ, Frizelle, H, Gadsden, J, Gautier, P, Gupta, RK, Gürkan, Y, Hardman, HD, Harrop-Griffiths, W, Hebbard, P, Hernandez, N, Hlasny, J, Iohom, G, Ip, VHY, Jeng, CL, Johnson, RL, Kalagara, H, Kinirons, B, Lansdown, AK, Leng, JC, Lim, YC, Lobo, C, Ludwin, DB, Macfarlane, AJR, Machi, AT, Mahon, P, Mannion, S, McLeod, DH, Merjavy, P, Miscuks, A, Mitchell, CH, Moka, E, Moran, P, Ngui, A, Nin, OC, O’Donnell, BD, Pawa, A, Perlas, A, Porter, S, Pozek, JP, Rebelo, HC, Roqués, V, Schroeder, KM, Schwartz, G, Schwenk, ES, Sermeus, L, Shorten, G, Srinivasan, K, Stevens, MF, Theodoraki, K, Turbitt, LR, Valdés-Vilches, LF, Volk, T, Webster, K, Wiesmann, T, Wilson, SH, Wolmarans, M, Woodworth, G, Worek, AK & Moran, EML 2022, 'Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: An expert panel Delphi consensus project', Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, sēj. 47, Nr. 5, lpp. 301-308. https://doi.org/10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136

Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: An expert panel Delphi consensus project. / Ahmed, Hassan M.; Atterton, Benjamin P.; Crowe, Gillian G. u.c.
(gadā): Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Sēj. 47, Nr. 5, 2022, lpp. 301-308.

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

TY - JOUR

T1 - Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia

T2 - An expert panel Delphi consensus project

AU - Ahmed, Hassan M.

AU - Atterton, Benjamin P.

AU - Crowe, Gillian G.

AU - Barratta, Jaime L.

AU - Johnson, Mark

AU - Viscusi, Eugene

AU - Adhikary, Sanjib

AU - Albrecht, Eric

AU - Boretsky, Karen

AU - Boublik, Jan

AU - Breslin, Dara S.

AU - Byrne, Kelly

AU - Chŉg, Alan

AU - Chuan, Alwin

AU - Conroy, Patrick

AU - Daniel, Craig

AU - Daszkiewicz, Andrzej

AU - Delbos, Alain

AU - Dirzu, Dan Sebastian

AU - Dmytriiev, Dmytro

AU - Fennessy, Paul

AU - Fischer, H. Barrie J.

AU - Frizelle, Henry

AU - Gadsden, Jeff

AU - Gautier, Philippe

AU - Gupta, Rajnish K.

AU - Gürkan, Yavuz

AU - Hardman, Harold David

AU - Harrop-Griffiths, William

AU - Hebbard, Peter

AU - Hernandez, Nadia

AU - Hlasny, Jakub

AU - Iohom, Gabriella

AU - Ip, Vivian H.Y.

AU - Jeng, Christina L.

AU - Johnson, Rebecca L.

AU - Kalagara, Hari

AU - Kinirons, Brian

AU - Lansdown, Andrew Kenneth

AU - Leng, Jody C.

AU - Lim, Yean Chin

AU - Lobo, Clara

AU - Ludwin, Danielle B.

AU - Macfarlane, Alan James Robert

AU - Machi, Anthony T.

AU - Mahon, Padraig

AU - Mannion, Stephen

AU - McLeod, David H.

AU - Merjavy, Peter

AU - Miscuks, Aleksejs

AU - Mitchell, Christopher H.

AU - Moka, Eleni

AU - Moran, Peter

AU - Ngui, Ann

AU - Nin, Olga C.

AU - O’Donnell, Brian D.

AU - Pawa, Amit

AU - Perlas, Anahi

AU - Porter, Steven

AU - Pozek, John Paul

AU - Rebelo, Humberto C.

AU - Roqués, Vicente

AU - Schroeder, Kristopher M.

AU - Schwartz, Gary

AU - Schwenk, Eric S.

AU - Sermeus, Luc

AU - Shorten, George

AU - Srinivasan, Karthikeyan

AU - Stevens, Markus F.

AU - Theodoraki, Kassiani

AU - Turbitt, Lloyd R.

AU - Valdés-Vilches, Luis Fernando

AU - Volk, Thomas

AU - Webster, Katrina

AU - Wiesmann, T.

AU - Wilson, Sylvia H.

AU - Wolmarans, Morné

AU - Woodworth, Glenn

AU - Worek, Andrew K.

AU - Moran, E. M.Louise

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background and objectives Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Results Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.

AB - Background and objectives Documentation is important for quality improvement, education, and research. There is currently a lack of recommendations regarding key aspects of documentation in regional anesthesia. The aim of this study was to establish recommendations for documentation in regional anesthesia. Methods Following the formation of the executive committee and a directed literature review, a long list of potential documentation components was created. A modified Delphi process was then employed to achieve consensus amongst a group of international experts in regional anesthesia. This consisted of 2 rounds of anonymous electronic voting and a final virtual round table discussion with live polling on items not yet excluded or accepted from previous rounds. Progression or exclusion of potential components through the rounds was based on the achievement of strong consensus. Strong consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement and weak consensus as 50%-74% agreement. Results Seventy-seven collaborators participated in both rounds 1 and 2, while 50 collaborators took part in round 3. In total, experts voted on 83 items and achieved a strong consensus on 51 items, weak consensus on 3 and rejected 29. Conclusion By means of a modified Delphi process, we have established expert consensus on documentation in regional anesthesia.

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85128000642

U2 - 10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136

DO - 10.1136/RAPM-2021-103136

M3 - Article

C2 - 35193970

AN - SCOPUS:85128000642

SN - 1098-7339

VL - 47

SP - 301

EP - 308

JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine

IS - 5

ER -

Recommendations for effective documentation in regional anesthesia: An expert panel Delphi consensus project

Kopsavilkums

Piekļuve Dokumentiem

Citi faili un saites

Nospiedums

Citēt šo