Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Susceptibilities of MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates to unconventional drugs compared with their reported pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters

  • for the Global PETTS Investigators
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
  • Taiwan Centers for Disease Control
  • South African Medical Research Council
  • Tropical Disease Foundation
  • Ministerio de Salud del Perú
  • Riga East University Hospital
  • Yonsei University
  • National Masan Hospital
  • National Institutes of Health
  • Vladimir Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary
  • Office of Disease Prevention and Control Region 7
  • Orel Oblast Tuberculosis Dispensary
  • North-Estonia Regional Hospital
  • Eye Clinic of Tartu University Hospital
  • Russian Academy of Medical Sciences

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālamZinātniskais raksts (žurnālā)koleģiāli recenzēts

27 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

Background: The second-line drugs recommended to treat drug-resistant TB are toxic, expensive and difficult to procure. Given increasing resistance, the need for additional anti-TB drugs has become more urgent. But new drugs take time to develop and are expensive. Some commercially available drugs have reported antimycobacterial activity but are not routinely used because supporting laboratory and clinical evidence is sparse. Methods: We analysed 217 MDR M. tuberculosis isolates including 153 initial isolates from unique patients and 64 isolates from follow-up specimens during the course of treatment. The resazurinmicrodilution assaywas performed to determine MICs of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, mefloquine, thioridazine, clofazimine, amoxicillin/clavulanate, meropenem/clavulanate, nitazoxanide, linezolid and oxyphenbutazone. Isoniazid was used for validation. We calculated theMIC50 andMIC90 as theMICs atwhich growth of 50% and 90% of isolates was inhibited, respectively. Results: TheMIC50s, in mg/L, for initial isolateswere as follows: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 0.2/4;mefloquine, 8; thioridazine, 4; clofazimine, 0.25; amoxicillin/clavulanate, 16/8; meropenem/clavulanate, 1/2.5; nitazoxanide, 16; linezolid, 0.25; and oxyphenbutazone, 40. The MIC90s, in mg/L, for initial isolateswere as follows: trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, 0>4/8; mefloquine, 8; thioridazine, 8; clofazimine, 0.5; amoxicillin/clavulanate, 32/16; meropenem/clavulanate, 8/2.5; nitazoxanide, 16; linezolid, 0.25; and oxyphenbutazone, 60. By comparison, the MIC90 of isoniazid was > 4 mg/L, as expected. There was no evidence that previous treatment affected susceptibility to any drug. Conclusions: Most drugs demonstrated efficacy against M. tuberculosis. When these MICs are compared with the published pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profiles of the respective drugs in humans, trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole, meropenem/clavulanate, linezolid, clofazimine and nitazoxanide appear promising and warrant further clinical investigation.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Lapas (no-līdz)1678-1687
Lapu skaits10
ŽurnālsJournal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy
Sējums72
Izdevuma numurs6
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - 1 jūn. 2017
Ārēji publicēts

ANO IAM

Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

  1. 3. IAM — Laba Veselība un Labbūtība
    3. IAM — Laba Veselība un Labbūtība

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Susceptibilities of MDR Mycobacterium tuberculosis isolates to unconventional drugs compared with their reported pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameters”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo