TY - JOUR
T1 - The Clinical and Genetic Landscape of Hereditary Cancer
T2 - Experience from a Single Clinical Diagnostic Laboratory
AU - Tsoulos, Nikolaos
AU - Agiannitopoulos, Konstantinos
AU - Potska, Kevisa
AU - Katseli, Anastasia
AU - Ntogka, Christina
AU - Pepe, Georgia
AU - Bouzarelou, Dimitra
AU - Papathanasiou, Athanasios
AU - Grigoriadis, Dimitrios
AU - Tsaousis, Georgios N.
AU - Gogas, Helen
AU - Troupis, Theodore
AU - Papazisis, Konstantinos
AU - Natsiopoulos, Ioannis
AU - Venizelos, Vassileios
AU - Amarantidis, Kyriakos
AU - Giassas, Stylianos
AU - Papadimitriou, Christos
AU - Fountzilas, Elena
AU - Stathoulopoulou, Maroulio
AU - Koumarianou, Anna
AU - Xepapadakis, Grigorios
AU - Blidaru, Alexandru
AU - Zob, Daniela
AU - Voinea, Oana
AU - Özdoğan, Mustafa
AU - Ergören, Mahmut Çerkez
AU - Hegmane, Alinta
AU - Papadopoulou, Eirini
AU - Nasioulas, George
AU - Markopoulos, Christos
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 International Institute of Anticancer Research. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/9
Y1 - 2024/9
N2 - Background/Aim: The application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in the genetic investigation of hereditary cancer is important for clinical surveillance, therapeutic approach, and reducing the risk of developing new malignancies. The aim of the study was to explore genetic predisposition in individuals referred for hereditary cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 8,261 individuals were referred for multigene genetic testing, during the period 2020-2023, in the laboratory, and underwent multigene genetic testing using NGS. Among the examined individuals, 56.17% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 6.77% with ovarian cancer, 2.88% with colorectal cancer, 1.91% with prostate cancer, 6.43% were healthy with a significant family history of cancer, while 3.06% had a different type of cancer and 0.21% had not provided any information. Additionally, in 85 women with breast cancer we performed whole exome sequencing analysis. Results: 20% of the examined individuals carried a pathogenic variant. Specifically, 54.8% of the patients had a pathogenic variant in a clinically significant gene (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, PMS2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, TP53, MSH6, APC, RAD51D, PTEN, RET, CDH1, MEN1, and VHL). Among the different types of pathogenic variants detected, a significant percentage (6.52%) represented copy number variation (CNV). With WES analysis, the following findings were detected: CTC1: c.880C>T, p.(Gln294*); MLH3: c.405del, p.(Asp136Metfs*2), PPM1D: c.1426_1430del, p.(Glu476Leufs*3), and SDHB: c.395A>G, p.(His132Arg). Conclusion: Comprehensive multigene genetic testing is necessary for appropriate clinical management of pathogenic variants’ carriers. Additionally, the information obtained is important for determining the risk of malignancy development in family members of the examined individuals.
AB - Background/Aim: The application of next-generation sequencing (NGS) technology in the genetic investigation of hereditary cancer is important for clinical surveillance, therapeutic approach, and reducing the risk of developing new malignancies. The aim of the study was to explore genetic predisposition in individuals referred for hereditary cancer. Materials and Methods: A total of 8,261 individuals were referred for multigene genetic testing, during the period 2020-2023, in the laboratory, and underwent multigene genetic testing using NGS. Among the examined individuals, 56.17% were diagnosed with breast cancer, 6.77% with ovarian cancer, 2.88% with colorectal cancer, 1.91% with prostate cancer, 6.43% were healthy with a significant family history of cancer, while 3.06% had a different type of cancer and 0.21% had not provided any information. Additionally, in 85 women with breast cancer we performed whole exome sequencing analysis. Results: 20% of the examined individuals carried a pathogenic variant. Specifically, 54.8% of the patients had a pathogenic variant in a clinically significant gene (BRCA1, BRCA2, PALB2, RAD51C, PMS2, CDKN2A, MLH1, MSH2, TP53, MSH6, APC, RAD51D, PTEN, RET, CDH1, MEN1, and VHL). Among the different types of pathogenic variants detected, a significant percentage (6.52%) represented copy number variation (CNV). With WES analysis, the following findings were detected: CTC1: c.880C>T, p.(Gln294*); MLH3: c.405del, p.(Asp136Metfs*2), PPM1D: c.1426_1430del, p.(Glu476Leufs*3), and SDHB: c.395A>G, p.(His132Arg). Conclusion: Comprehensive multigene genetic testing is necessary for appropriate clinical management of pathogenic variants’ carriers. Additionally, the information obtained is important for determining the risk of malignancy development in family members of the examined individuals.
KW - Hereditary cancer
KW - next generation sequencing
KW - whole exome sequencing
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85202760764
U2 - 10.21873/cgp.20463
DO - 10.21873/cgp.20463
M3 - Article
C2 - 39191493
AN - SCOPUS:85202760764
SN - 1109-6535
VL - 21
SP - 448
EP - 463
JO - Cancer Genomics and Proteomics
JF - Cancer Genomics and Proteomics
IS - 5
ER -