Kopsavilkums
A judge's mission is to protect the fundamental values of the liberal constitutional order: democracy, the rule of law, and human rights. The constitutional structure of democracy after the World War II is based on the presumption that the judges can fulfill this mission. The rise of populism and illiberal democracies, which challenge the liberal constitutional order, shows that judges are limited in the proper execution of this mission. Court packing is a crucial point in the building of illiberal democracies, and it should be avoided. This article discusses and defines the mission of the judge in the liberal constitutional order and also addresses the main challenges for the liberal constitutional order in these uncertain times. Faced with challenges from illiberal democracy, judges should maintain this constitutional mission to protect democracy, the rule of law and human rights. For this reason, new approaches and strategies of the judiciary should be found. The legal tools for protecting the liberal constitutional order have their own limits and weaknesses. Additionally, the time for judges as cult figures of popular culture is gone. Current challenges require judges to exhibit humility, modesty, and optimism.
| Oriģinālvaloda | Angļu |
|---|---|
| Lapas (no-līdz) | 56-67 |
| Lapu skaits | 12 |
| Žurnāls | Baltic Journal of Law and Politics |
| Sējums | 18 |
| Izdevuma numurs | 6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publikācijas statuss | Publicēts - 1 jūl. 2025 |
ANO IAM
Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)
-
16. IAM — Miers, Taisnīgums un Spēcīgas Iestādes
OECD Zinātnes nozare
- 5.5 Tiesību zinātne
Nospiedums
Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “The Role of a Judge in Uncertain Times”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.Citēt šo
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver