Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Towards understanding reactor relevant tokamak pedestals

  • Līga Avotiņa (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Larisa Baumane (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Mihails Haļitovs (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Juris Jansons (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Gunta Ķizāne (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Ričards Kovaldins (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Andris Leščinskis (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Broņislavs Leščinskis (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Elīna Pajuste (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Aigars Vītiņš (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Artūrs Zariņš (Darba grupas dalībnieks)
  • , Ham C.J.
  • , JET Contributors

    Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālam › Zinātniskais raksts (žurnālā) › koleģiāli recenzēts

    6 Atsauces (Scopus)

    Kopsavilkums

    The physics of the tokamak pedestal is still not fully understood, for example there is no fully predictive model for the pedestal height and width. However, the pedestal is key in determining the fusion power for a given scenario. If we can improve our understanding of reactor relevant pedestals we will improve our confidence in designing potential fusion power plants. Work has been carried out as part of a collaboration on reactor relevant pedestal physics.We report some of the results in detail here and review some of the wider work which will be reported in full elsewhere. First, we attempt to use a gyrokinetic-based calculation to eliminate the pedestal top density as a model input for Europed/EPED pedestal predictions.We assume power balance at the top of the pedestal, that is, the heat flux crossing the separatrix must be equal to the heat source at the top of the pedestal and investigate the consequences of this assumption. Unfortunately, the transport assumptions of the EPED model mean that this method does not discriminate between different pairs of density and temperature profiles for a given pressure profile. Second, we investigate the effects of non flux surface density on the bootstrap current. Third, type I ELMs will not be tolerable for a reactor relevant regime due to the damage that they are expected to cause to plasma facing components. In recent years various methods of running tokamak plasmas without large ELMs have been developed. These include small and no ELM regimes, the use of resonant magnetic perturbations and the use of vertical kicks. We discuss the quiescent H-mode here. Finally we give a summary and directions for future work EURATOM 2021.

    OriģinālvalodaAngļu
    Raksta numurs096013
    ŽurnālsNuclear Fusion
    Sējums61
    Izdevuma numurs9
    DOIs
    Publikācijas statussPublicēts - sept. 2021

    ANO IAM

    Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

    1. 7. IAM — Tīra Enerģija par Pieejamu Cenu
      7. IAM — Tīra Enerģija par Pieejamu Cenu

    OECD Zinātnes nozare

    • 1.3 Fizika un astronomija

    Nospiedums

    Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Towards understanding reactor relevant tokamak pedestals”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

    Citēt šo