Pāriet uz galveno navigāciju Pāriet uz meklēšanu Pāriet uz galveno saturu

Variations in very preterm birth rates in 30 high-income countries: are valid international comparisons possible using routine data?

  • the Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee
  • Inra
  • Netherlands Organisation for Applied Scientific Research
  • Anton de Kom University of Suriname
  • University of Leicester
  • Institute of Mother and Child
  • Emory University
  • Public Health Agency of Canada
  • The Institute for the Care of Mother and Child
  • The Centre for Disease Prevention and Control of Latvia
  • Tallinn University
  • National Institute for Health and Welfare
  • Karolinska Institutet
  • National Center for Child Health and Development
  • Albert Einstein College of Medicine
  • McGill University

Zinātniskās darbības rezultāts: Devums žurnālamZinātniskais raksts (žurnālā)koleģiāli recenzēts

54 Atsauces (Scopus)

Kopsavilkums

Objective: Concerns about differences in registration practices across countries have limited the use of routine data for international very preterm birth (VPT) rate comparisons. Design: Population-based study. Setting: Twenty-seven European countries, the United States, Canada and Japan in 2010. Population: A total of 9 376 252 singleton births. Method: We requested aggregated gestational age data on live births, stillbirths and terminations of pregnancy (TOP) before 32 weeks of gestation, and information on registration practices for these births. We compared VPT rates and assessed the impact of births at 22–23 weeks of gestation, and different criteria for inclusion of stillbirths and TOP on country rates and rankings. Main outcome measures: Singleton very preterm birth rate, defined as singleton stillbirths and live births before 32 completed weeks of gestation per 1000 total births, excluding TOP if identifiable in the data source. Results: Rates varied from 5.7 to 15.7 per 1000 total births and 4.0 to 11.9 per 1000 live births. Country registration practices were related to percentage of births at 22–23 weeks of gestation (between 1% and 23% of very preterm births) and stillbirths (between 6% and 40% of very preterm births). After excluding births at 22–23 weeks, rate variations remained high and with a few exceptions, country rankings were unchanged. Conclusions: International comparisons of very preterm birth rates using routine data should exclude births at 22–23 weeks of gestation and terminations of pregnancy. The persistent large rate variations after these exclusions warrant continued surveillance of VPT rates at 24 weeks and over in high-income countries. Tweetable abstract: International comparisons of VPT rates should exclude births at 22–23 weeks of gestation and terminations of pregnancy.

OriģinālvalodaAngļu
Lapas (no-līdz)785-794
Lapu skaits10
ŽurnālsBJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology
Sējums124
Izdevuma numurs5
DOIs
Publikācijas statussPublicēts - 1 apr. 2017
Ārēji publicēts

ANO IAM

Šis izpildes rezultāts palīdz sasniegt šādus ANO ilgtspējīgas attīstības mērķus (IAM)

  1. 3. IAM — Laba Veselība un Labbūtība
    3. IAM — Laba Veselība un Labbūtība

OECD Zinātnes nozare

  • 3. Medicīnas un veselības zinātnes

Nospiedums

Uzziniet vairāk par pētniecības tēmām “Variations in very preterm birth rates in 30 high-income countries: are valid international comparisons possible using routine data?”. Kopā tie veido unikālu nospiedumu.

Citēt šo